Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+VLF\s+29501\,\s+signal\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 07:40:56 -0500
Paul Believe Dex W4DEX may have been transmitting at the time. Might check with him for verification. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 Dabbling with a spectrogram at 29501 Hz and back-dating it a co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00166.html (11,615 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:35:45 -0500
Markus; Yes, 9 kHz is next or better yet "ELF"! I have to come up with more antenna height. 200' minimum so could run more than 200 watts without burning down the house! Uwe in Deutchland has develop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00324.html (13,429 bytes)

3. RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:39:25 -0700
Congrats Dex, Bob, Paul and Warren for individual and team efforts and a great accomplishment! 73, Jim AA5BW An exchange of PMs confirms that Dex was transmitting at that time on 29501 Hz. Comparison
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00325.html (12,018 bytes)

4. RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:28:25 -0700
And folks whose work in recent years provided tools, methods, and inspiration. The transmission from Dex coincided with the second night of reception of Bob's signal. I put the two bands together in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00326.html (12,867 bytes)

5. RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 22:47:49 -0500
Markus; It is even worse using the same short ant, say that I am using on 29 at 800 w. I would say a power reduction of several db would be required and added to your calculated signal reduction when
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00327.html (14,350 bytes)

6. RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 00:22:50 -0700
Paul, These are priceless, and informative; thanks. Jim AA5BW Determined listeners might try this one. This is last night's transmission, 9 hours starting 2014-03-04 23:00 and the time compression ra
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00328.html (13,085 bytes)

7. RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:02:20 -0500
Johan; CW very clear using "ear buds" sure is solid-Bob > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:15:50 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? >
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00329.html (13,057 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:16:29 +0000
An exchange of PMs confirms that Dex was transmitting at that time on 29501 Hz. Comparison of average signal level in 55uHz bandwidth from 02:00 to 07:00 UT http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/140305a.png Bob
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00622.html (10,453 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:39:28 +0100
Paul, Dex, Bob, wow, I am very much impressed by this work! So it seems there's three to share the honour of the first amateur VLF atlantic crossing. Funny that history seems to repeat itself - remem
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00623.html (13,021 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:25:00 +0100
Hello Paul and all, Many thanks for the compilation and to anyone else involved - almost as impressive as the VLF natural radio signals ! As Johan 'LKM said, playing the file in a loop gives good rec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00624.html (12,721 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 20:23:51 +0000
The transmission from Dex coincided with the second night of reception of Bob's signal. I put the two bands together in this image http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/140305b.png Dex informs me he was transmi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00625.html (11,634 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:48:37 +0100
Yes, an impressive achievement indeed, congratulations to all involved! Wow is the word! The 24dB S/N ratio on Dex' signal exceeded all my expectations! 24 dB S/N is "armchair copy". It would be inte
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00626.html (12,724 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:50:47 +0100
Also from me! :-) Go on with the interesting work. There will be more stations receiving you. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 05.03.2014 20:39, schrieb hvanesce: Congrats Dex, Bob, Paul and Warren for individual
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00627.html (11,486 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 00:08:04 +0100
Johan, unfortunately the difference between "upper and lower" VLF will be much larger than that. Operating a small electric antenna at the same voltage limit, radiated power scales with the fourth po
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00628.html (13,817 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:55:57 +0000
Well that 24dB is a 5 hour integration in 55uHz. It makes a big sharp line on the spectrum though. At VLF that counts as 'armchair'. No problem. 5 hours compressed into 22.5 seconds and frequency shi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00629.html (11,827 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:28:16 +0000
Determined listeners might try this one. This is last night's transmission, 9 hours starting 2014-03-04 23:00 and the time compression ratio is the same (x800) http://67.207.143.181/wh2xba1_140303b.w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00630.html (11,757 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:59:39 +0100
Hi Bob, Markus, Another thing is the coil losses. You will need about 10x more L to resonate the antenna when going down from 29.5 kHz to 8.27 kHz. Oh, that would be 300 kV if Bob wants to run the sa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00631.html (16,045 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? (score: 1)
Author: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:15:50 +0100
May thanks for the files Paul! Yes. It will never become a popular "realtime chat mode" of course... Not exactly armchair copy but by looping the file a couple of times for "mental integration" I got
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00632.html (12,466 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu