Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Silent\s+majority\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:45:36 -0500
Several of us did exactly this last year (SSTV on 600m). The WE2XGR license (505-515kHz) 200W ERP can run practically any data modes as well as ssb. By staying above 510kHz we avoided causing QRM to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00143.html (14,589 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: "Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:23:57 +0100
Dear LF, Geri DK8KW and Markus did some interesting slow-voice experiments on 137 kHz a few years back. Definitely not a DX-mode, and a bit of a bandwidth-gobbler too ;-) Follow the link below:- http
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00272.html (18,079 bytes)

3. RE: LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:11:00 +0100
And the protoype HeyPhone was tested on 73 kHz in Yorkshire. No-one complained. John F5VLF ** REPLY SEPARATOR **
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00572.html (15,484 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:36:56 +0000 (GMT)
Hi LF Since by general consent the 600m band is now wide open for experimentation of whatever computer aided mode that can be down loaded for free off the Internet. Might I suggest the use of SSTV. T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00612.html (15,333 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:05:34 +0100
There you go guys. You may as well stop your 600m experiments right now as Mal has proclaimed that there is "nothing new to discover". Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could all see the future as clear
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00654.html (12,101 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:11:47 +0000
This will test the CW rise/fall time shaping of all these class d/e home made manual telegraphy transmitters. It will also require that the CW operators remain below 12wpm. John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00818.html (9,995 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:58:35 +0100
Dear Pete, LF Group, This is presumably the same silent majority that complain about lack of activity. It would be nice if the majority was a little less silent, at least in the RF sense. Ofcom have
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00930.html (12,651 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:56:28 +0000 (GMT)
Hi John and LF<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> They say when you are trying to get out of a hole stop digging. You are right of course from recent reading
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01276.html (12,110 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu