Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+DK0SWF\s+antenna\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:34:47 +0200
Hello Christian, Ok, so perseverance paid off :-) but it looks like the MF fieldday is over now -- nothing audible here. I was busy from family matters during morning to afternoon so I missed most of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00050.html (11,719 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 00:58:30 +0200
John, Calling CQ ad infinitum, while also 60Hz higher I also copy DF0WD calling CQ too. I assume neither station can hear each other? < Of course I could hear DK0SWF calling CQ about 100 Hz away. But
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00066.html (12,115 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:15:54 +0100
Wolf Overall considerations, Data modes that need Linear amps are very inefficient. It is preferable to choose modes that use C, D or E amplifiers like CW or QRSS one level demodulation. Two level mi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00101.html (13,120 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:26:46 +0100
May be Mal But once again Jim has the answer to this problem ..if you can find his articles after Google trashed the uk500khz news group , I think Jose R predicts a 6 dB gain by changing to PSK from
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00108.html (14,045 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:44:18 +0200
Hello Christian, I have a few MOSFETs type HUF 75343 P3 to donate... they are 75 A, 55 V, and Rds_on = 9 mOhm. Only disadvantage is a relatively large gate capacitance, but despite that they work rea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00110.html (12,434 bytes)

6. LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "DL7ET" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 22:13:10 +0100
DK0SWF is on 3651 now and can answer your questions 73 Veit DL7ET Geri It would be better if DK0SWF went QRT, causing bad QRM to all the other stations on the frequency and cannot hear anyone calling
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00135.html (12,193 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: JohnPumford-Green <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:23:02 +0100
Klaus, Mal et al, Strong signals here from DK0SWF on 472.4kHz in Shetland, IP90gg Calling CQ ad infinitum, while also 60Hz higher I also copy DF0WD calling CQ too. I assume neither station can hear e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00166.html (11,464 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:16:18 -0400
Does anyone know if they will be operating during the overnight period? Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 John, Calling CQ ad infinitum, while also 60Hz higher I also copy DF0WD calling CQ too. I assume neith
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00214.html (12,548 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 09:22:52 +0100
Stefan Write a report about a QRM generator. This is not the first time this has happened on both LF es MF.when operating from an ex commercial site antenna. These commercial sites were used for Broa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00225.html (15,329 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 21:02:19 -0230 (NDT)
Hi Jay, Group. RX is now on 472.5 kHz and TX QRV on 1825. Lets hope they resume operations. 73 Joe Does anyone know if they will be operating during the overnight period? Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00243.html (13,619 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 22:21:26 +0200
I'll join in too, soon. My temporary MF grabber is at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html, active during i am active... 73, Stefan Am 09.09.2012 21:24, schrieb C. Groe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00263.html (11,621 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 22:18:16 +0200
Hello Chris and group, Looks like the 1 Ampere antenna current are doing a great job: Just grabbed from the DX cluster, http://www.dxsummit.fi/CustomFilter.aspx?customCount=50&customRange=472 OH2BCI-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00268.html (11,780 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:36:26 +0100
Christian Looking out for you at present on 472.5 but nil hrd so far. Just had a QSO with DF0WD 73 De mal/g3kev question if this was a real report, was ignored...
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00284.html (12,215 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "C. Groeger" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:53:16 +0200
Hello Wolf, I finally reached dk0swf in the early morning. He gave me 599. My question if this was a real report, was ignored... 73 Df5qg Christian Groeger
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00354.html (12,328 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:38:41 -0230 (NDT)
Thank-you Wolf. Unfortunately only QRN has been heard on 472.5 so far. 73 Joe Hello Joe, rrr - but their RX frequency is 3544 kHz now. 73, Wolf . Am 09.09.2012 01:32, schrieb [email protected]: Hi Jay, G
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00466.html (14,992 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 17:10:01 +0100
If you think that was a bad show, you should of tried introducing DATA to 500 , everything from news group spamming to on air jamming took place , it was going to be the end of the world as 'we knew
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00476.html (14,236 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 01:28:37 +0200
Hello Jay, Possibly yes, at least at the moment I can still hear them calling on 472.5 kHz with a piece of wire on my TS-850. But the calling intervals are more 'widely spaced' now, hi. But the signa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00484.html (13,706 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:47:18 +0200
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00513.html (12,902 bytes)

19. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "C. Groeger" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:17:04 +0200
Hello Wolf! These are quite good news! Thanks! Last night I changed the transformer of the irf 540. A ferrit Core from an old tv set works much better than these amidon toys... Now ant current nearly
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00536.html (11,442 bytes)

20. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 22:07:43 +0200
Hi Chris, I'm already back home. Nothing heard from the OH guys on 80 meters, which is no big surprise under these conditions. 80 meters "opens too late". Much in contrast to 630 meters :o) Did you c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00553.html (12,692 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu