Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Capacitance\s+switch\s+box\s+design\s+\-\s+what\s+is\s+the\s+simplest\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Capacitance\s+switch\s+box\s+design\s+\-\s+what\s+is\s+the\s+simplest\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:29:05 +0100; Hi Roger, Am 16.01.2011 17:24, schrieb Roger Lapthorn: I'll make an order for a bunch of the recommended caps tonight and some thicker wire for the loop. Well, maybe its better to use several thin (e; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00107.html (25,815 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? (score: 1): Author: g4gvw <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:54:13 +0000; Hi All, I'm pleased there are others running OpenOffice AND probably flavours of Linux too in this group. I, personally, love Oo,s versatility and find it an extremely rare occasion that I am unable; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00210.html (13,023 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:57:13 +0100; Or "5" caps 1,2,4,8,16...... really 5 switches becasue you may need to parallel caps to meet these values. I suggest the high voltage pulse-rated caps that we (Andy et al) were recently talking about; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00259.html (13,966 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:28:50 +0100; Hi Roger, Am 16.01.2011 17:24, schrieb Roger Lapthorn: I'll make an order for a bunch of the recommended caps tonight and some thicker wire for the loop. Well, maybe its better to use several thin (e; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00343.html (25,880 bytes)
5. RE: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? (score: 1): Author: Laurence KL7UK <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:20:52 -0900; For those that have word.doc I commend reading Bill Ashlocks' 2 part series on Loops and conductor sizing etc via Mike WE0H's link http://www.we0h.us/Amateur_Radio_stuff/Transmitting-Loops/Bill-Ashlo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00570.html (32,567 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? (score: 1): Author: Stephen McAdam <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:49:49 +0000; Hi John Yes you can, I've just opened the three documents using Open Office and saved them in Open Office Document format. Regards Steve, G4VDB On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:33 PM, John Rabson <john.rabs; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00632.html (12,444 bytes)
7. Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? (score: 1): Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:33:32 +0100; Will it run Open Office? John F5VLF On 16 Jan 2011, at 18:20CET, Laurence KL7UK wrote: For those that have word.doc I commend reading Bill Ashlocks' 2 part series on Loops and conductor sizing etc vi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00921.html (12,038 bytes)
8. Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:24:54 +0000; Thanks for the FAST response to my cap switch box question: I got 3 within 20 minutes on and off the list. It's good to see people here are so helpful, even when the question may seem a trivial one.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg01063.html (32,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]