Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Mini\-Whip\s+Antenna\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "DENNIS EASTERLING" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:16:40 +0100
Dear Roelof and Petr When I first tried the mini-whip I was very sceptical of its performance, but in my circumstances, living surrounded by houses and near a main line electric railway ((25kV) it ha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00020.html (16,519 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:20:06 +0100
Hello Minto, In laboratory tests it is possible to tweak the bias of the J310 for a very high IP2 of +80 dBm and a IP3 of +33 dBm. However this does not hold in off air tests. I use the medium wave s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00070.html (11,825 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:33:54 +0100
Hi, Question: any experiences about comparable replacements for the U/J310 and 2N5109? Especially the latter one? 73, Peter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00129.html (10,831 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:46:19 +0100
Hello Ken, I use 40 mm PVC pipe with an end caps at both ends. The end caps are glued with PVC glue to the pipe and this is watertight. The bottom end cap does hold a BNC connector and has a 1 mm ven
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00246.html (11,051 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:25:20 +0100
J310's are still plenty available (at least her in PA country...) 2N5109's however are not. A BF199 seems a bit too small for the dissipated power...? I used a 2N3866. seems to work well but I have n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00289.html (13,779 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Ken" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:04:22 +0100
Hello Roelof. Very interesting, I am just about to commission my MiniWhip, the hold up has been several things, firstly winding a high value power take-off inductor, but mainly what to seal the ends
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00315.html (13,993 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: g4gvw <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:19:34 +0000
We actually did seriously consider this as a solution to a a very difficult problem in an industrial situation some years ago when we were colleagues and dealing with a situation that involved both e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00354.html (13,182 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:42:17 +0100
Maybe a suitable IC g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00437.html (11,002 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:31:07 +0100
Hello Peter, The J310 is the best choice, I found so far and these are cheap and widely available. However, you can try anything you have at hand. A good modern replacement for the 2N5109 is the BFQ1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00438.html (10,276 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:32:52 -0800 (PST)
May be mistypo? BF245 is a N JFET, BC245 I don't know. Regards D. From: DENNIS EASTERLING <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sun, January 16, 2011 9:16:36 PM Su
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00490.html (13,539 bytes)

11. LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:57:38 +0000
I'll join the show my mini-whip discussion. The antenna is amazing as most everyone knows by now. I recall Mitch Powell, VE3OT, building one in the base of a 6V6 using the tube's plate for the antenn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00493.html (12,617 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:36:08 +0100
Hi Roelof, Some interesting comments there. On the topic of feeder pick up Alan G3NYK and myself have had many conversations over the years about ways to deal with the problem and a method we've neve
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00529.html (11,384 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:53:30 +0100
Hello Petr, Thank you for your kind words. When I became serious about listening at LF, I messed around a long time with loop antennas. Unfortunately these pick up too much noise for weak signal work
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00533.html (12,621 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:58:47 +0100
Hello Daniele, "Cases were the normal precautions like grounding the shield of the coax or the use of a rf-isolating transformer don't work". However, when the noise is radiated to the outside world,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00543.html (10,864 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "DENNIS EASTERLING" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:11:52 +0100
Dear Roelof and Petr When I first tried the mini-whip I was very sceptical of its performance, but in my circumstances, living surrounded by houses and near a main line electric railway ((25kV) it ha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00555.html (16,767 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:42:44 +0100
Hello Roelof, Yes at 200 mW there should not be a problem. I use a 2N3866 in my 2 mini-whips, on paper the 2N5109 en the 2N3866 looked comparable enough (as far as I remember). The mini-whip is much
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00597.html (13,305 bytes)

17. LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Petr Maly <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:15:35 +0100
Hello Roelof, It is an honour for me to have the answer directly from the author of this little magic thing. I didn't realize that you are on the group as well. How long did it take you to develop it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00609.html (10,643 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "DENNIS EASTERLING" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:17:37 +0100
Hi Peter I used a BC245 JFET instead of the J210, and a BF199 for the 2N5109. No circuit modifications appeared to be necessary. 73 Dennis M0JXM Hi, Question: any experiences about comparable replace
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00776.html (12,902 bytes)

19. RE: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:22:52 +0100
J310 and 2N5109 both available from: http://www.jabdog.com/main-cat-index.htm (accept PayPal) or http://www.cricklewoodelectronics.com/Cricklewood/pages.php?pageid=10 73 Terry --Original Message-- Fr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00817.html (12,992 bytes)

20. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:13:07 +0100
Dennis, if the loop-preamp system is well balanced the loop doesn't need screening. E.g. the Wellbrook ALA1530 broadband loop is unshielded. Therefore its preamp is a push-pull design. 73 Clemens DL4
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00842.html (11,986 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu