Mike, I am in favour of "full suffix" ;-) 73, Rik OR7T ________________________________________ Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Mike Dennison [mike
Mike, LF, Perhaps DFCW should be used for 60 seconds or longer elements, that would reduce time factor & duty cycle using full suffix. Then maybe everyone will be happy. -- 73, Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo.
That's true .. but worked nicely on 5 megs .. and the plots on 500 showed what could be done with a short pulse and some good software .. With the extreme qsb on LF , most of the long pulse beacon ,
gad...the only thing worse than single-letter ID's is no ID at all. This still does not address the problem of LFers who choose not to be on the reflectors as well as newcomers and casual tuners, wo
I have been active on 5 Mcs since it started some years ago and have no need for any Beacons although there is one active but I do not use it, but it sends the full callsign and has a proper licence
Hello Mike, all, for propagation test purposes (sound much better than beaconing) all we need is an unambiguous identification. A single character will lead to confusion, but 2 characters should do t
