Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+73kHz\s+T\/A\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:52:21 +0100
For those who may have missed it, I have left one of the better captures from this morning at: http://webpages.charter.net/w1tag/cap-1.jpg John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00389.html (8,640 bytes)

2. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:18:29 +0100
G3AQC wrote: I had tweaked the trimmer that tunes the xtal in the DFCW oscillator, in order to avoid Mikes transmission. This was a big mistake since the oscillator which has been stable for a year o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00390.html (9,888 bytes)

3. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:10:38 +0100
Agreeing with Peter and Laurie, I've got to say that it WAS an interesting night. The Kp index was at 1.67 (per NOAA) through most of the period. I didn't get home until 0200, and copy here had been
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00391.html (8,995 bytes)

4. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: José Manuel <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:19:41 +0100
Hi All: Very strong signals, as usual, from Peter on 72400.37 and Laurie on 72401.24 for dots and 72401.33 for dash. Laurie´s signals has initial drif and are out of the John´s passband. 73 de José,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00403.html (9,165 bytes)

5. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:25:09 -0500
Peter, I will be on 72.4004kHz from 2200 for a couple of hours. I will leave the receiver and screen capture runnning, with posts at the usual: http://webpages.charter.net/w1tag/cap-1.jpg Captures wi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00411.html (9,963 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 02:58:47 +0100
I am shutting the transmitter down now at 0100. Will be on at around 0515 to test the enviorionment theory. Received G3LDO with a fairly good signal, especially considering that the antenna was the d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00414.html (10,068 bytes)

7. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:58:31 +0100
Thanks to John and Dex for monitoring the signal frequency. I am shutting the transmitter down now at 0100. Will be on at around 0515 to test the enviorionment theory. Regards, Peter, G3LDO Web <http
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00415.html (9,678 bytes)

8. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:44:47 +0100
John & Dexter My! that's quick feedback. My frequency counter says 72.40043 John's recordings show the usual after midnight fade. I have just been down to the transmitting shed and all looks OK excep
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00416.html (10,735 bytes)

9. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:39:23 -0500
I was a little late in starting, but I'm posting screen captures of 72.400 - 72.401 every 15 minutes, starting at 2335 UTC. There appears to be a signal at 72.4004. I have a Loran line at 72400.28. C
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00418.html (9,929 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu