Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Progress\?\s+with\s+the\s+PA\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 12:26:33 -0500
http://n1bug.com/n1debug/ASB_LF_Amp-20171223.jpg Recall that last week I had increased turns on the output transformer from 3x5 to 3x10. That reduced heating of the FET but did not help to stabilize
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00117.html (9,209 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:34:09 +0000
What core ? What  dimensions ? Does it obey the fundamental equation for saturation in a core ? Vrms = 4.44 .F . N . A . B F Hz,   N turns,  A core area area in m^2   B Tesla Keep B < 0.1 and  ferrit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00118.html (10,547 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 05:53:39 -0500
Thanks Andy. I need more time to get my head around that equation. I'm still struggling with a near vertical learning curve on all of this. I never worked with ferrite (except in RFI suppression) unt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00127.html (13,189 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: Nick <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:57:17 +0000
All, I've been, sort of, following this as I have a similar problem with the amp at <http://www.qrp-labs.com/ultimate3/u3mods/lfamp.html> I have not used the 2n4 cap to ground on the gate (yet) but I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00130.html (12,615 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: Nick <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 12:23:00 +0000
Bad form to follow up my own post so fast but - just had a play and there is no obvious difference between the scope match at the shack or the aerial - except its a lot colder at the aerial :-) Howev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00131.html (10,039 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 12:36:54 -0500
Nick, I was very interested to read your email. I am sorry that you are also having problems with this PA but at least it isn't just me. A few comments threaded in below... I've been, sort of, follow
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00140.html (14,519 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: Alan de G1FXB <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:33:15 +0000
Hi Paul , Nick and any others using that PA design, (I 've being subscribed to the RSGB LF feed for 4-5 years ? and of course seen reference to the blacksheep feed but interpreted that as being a leg
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00147.html (18,211 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: Nick <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:22:39 +0000
Just as a reply to another message - yes a dummy load in perfect up to silly voltage I had not really thought that the reactance 'off frequency' might be an issue but I can see it could be a possibil
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00153.html (14,073 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:36:01 +0000
Hello Nick and Paul N1BUG Should this amp be driven by sine waves?? I assumed you were driving it direct from CLK0 of the Si synthesizer in a U3S, with square waves? -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00154.html (14,973 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:21:52 -0500
Hello Chris, Nick, and thanks Alan for your additions to this discussion. Should this amp be driven by sine waves?? I assumed you were driving it direct from CLK0 of the Si synthesizer in a U3S, with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00155.html (19,886 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Progress? with the PA (score: 1)
Author: Alan de G1FXB <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:59:34 +0000
Hi All, If you are using an LPF in front of the PA then regardless of U3 / U3S 'variability you are doing everything right to ensure a clean fundamental only signal to drive the PA. Not recently but
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-01/msg00162.html (23,082 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu