Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Please\s+more\s+normal\s+CW\s+activity\s+on\s+Saturday\s+and\s+Sunday\s+morning\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:59:45 +0100
I run 700W RF to make less than 200mW ERP. Is that QRO or QRP? Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.lf.thersgb.net
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00034.html (10,366 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:16:47 +0000
Hello Dick Although family commitments make it difficult for me to operate on Saturday and Sunday mornings, I will attempt to operate late morning on Sundays if the band sounds too quiet. Over the pa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00045.html (10,874 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:29:08 +0000
I would regret it if we would stop the QRSS transatlantic tests now The majority would disagree with you. Than I must be part of the minority, keep experimenting Nick (back to lurking)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00220.html (10,200 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:54:10 +0100
I have a bit of a problem with some recent mails. I agree that CW activity has decreased over the last months but I do not thing that QRSS is to blame for it. Apart from one case of unintentional QR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00244.html (13,284 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:54:44
I have a bit of a problem with some recent mails. I agree that CW activity has decreased over the last months but I do not thing that QRSS is to blame for it. Apart from one case of unintentional QRM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00269.html (11,707 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 07:49:50 +0100
From Dave G3YMC I would tend to agree with most of the points Steve made in his email. There is a desperate need for more normal CW QSOs on the band if we are to encourage new operators on the band -
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00272.html (11,744 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:39:38 -0800 (PST)
Gentlemen please, Don't let's start slagging one or another off. Surely one critic is enough, if not too many. I don't hear all that much activity on the band most days anyway. There is surely room f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00281.html (10,935 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Staples" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:11:43 +0100
Hi Steve Myself and some others in this area fully support your comments, I admit its a great achievement to make transatlantic but please enough is enough Gentlemen! give it a rest. regards Bill G0A
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00286.html (13,174 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:12:26 +0000
Sometimes a fellow amateur tells me he would like to become active on LF and asks my advice. I tell him/her to buy The low frequency experimenters handbook and/or the older Source book and to read wh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00287.html (12,662 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:50:05 +0100
PA0SE wrote: . . . . . . . . . . invariably the question comes what the best times are to listen for a signal. My answer has always been "Saturday and Sunday morning". But I'm afraid that won't help
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00293.html (10,857 bytes)

11. LF: Please more normal CW activity on Saturday and Sunday morning (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:53:06 +0100
To All from PA0SE Sometimes a fellow amateur tells me he would like to become active on LF and asks my advice. I tell him/her to buy The low frequency experimenters handbook and/or the older Source b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00364.html (10,563 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu