Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Loran\s+Line\s+or\s+U\.S\.\s+MedFER\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 19:28:04 +0100
Hi All, After looking at Dex's MedFER pages I am monitoring with SpecLab & QRSS10 around 1700Khz & I can see a very straight & continuous line on my display, could this be a Loran Line or something e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00057.html (9,656 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 13:41:23 EST
Hmm, I can't quite tell by looking. Highly unlikely to be a LORAN line at that frequency any more. On the other hand, 1705 is the upper limit for license-free operation, so if it's a MedFER, someone
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00058.html (9,749 bytes)

3. RE: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:29:43 +0100
Hi John & LF, Thanks for your reply. I didn't expect it to be a LORAN line this far away, I don't know the MedFER frequency band limits either. Since posting the e-mail the line at 1705004.5Hz now ha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00062.html (11,858 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:21:54 +0000
Gary - G4WGT wrote: I didn't expect it to be a LORAN line this far away, I don't know the MedFER frequency band limits either. Since posting the e-mail the line at 1705004.5Hz now has a slightly weak
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00064.html (13,186 bytes)

5. RE: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:07:59 +0100
Hi Dex, Thanks for the info, where can I find the actual freq allocations for these licence free operations? Good to see an example of what I should expect to see, I was just curious after looking at
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00066.html (11,902 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:20:50 EST
http://lwca.org/sitepage/part15/whatisit.htm contains a summary of the bands, and links to the applicable FCC Rules. John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00069.html (10,372 bytes)

7. RE: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:46:19 +0100
Thanks for the link John. 73 Gary. --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 05 January 2006 22:21 T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00076.html (11,535 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:35:12 +0100
I doubt that it could be a Loran line. The nearest Loran system in frequency used to be Loran A with a centre frequency just above 1900kHz. It was the bane of Topband DXers but was shut down years ag
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00080.html (10,580 bytes)

9. RE: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:01:14 +0100
Hi John, Thanks for that info, I don't remember LORAN A on 1900khz the only thing I recall is the navigational aid somewere around 1900khz which sent a series of differing frequency tones & was quite
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00082.html (10,450 bytes)

10. Re[2]: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:46:39 +0100
On reflection I think Loran A was on about 1930. From what I recall it sounded a bit like multiple bandsaws fading in and out with their relative phases wobbling around like the efforts of a not very
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00083.html (11,200 bytes)

11. Re[4]: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:07:08 +0100
The other reason for a dearth of international activity on top band 40 years ago was that much of the USA did not have a top band allocation. I can't be specific as my copy of the ARRL handbook for t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00150.html (11,997 bytes)

12. Re[4]: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:22:58 EST
Amateur rules, Part 12, late 1950s: Alaska, the states on the Gulf of Mexico, and the Caribbean had no privileges; 1975-2000: Hawaii and the western states (500w day, 200w night), except less in Wash
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00152.html (9,775 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu