Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER?
From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:21:54 +0000
Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:22:53 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Gary - G4WGT wrote:

 
I didn't expect it to be a LORAN line this far away, I don't know the MedFER frequency band limits either. Since posting the e-mail the line at 1705004.5Hz now has a slightly weaker companion at about 1705029.5Hz but if the high band edge is 1705 then it must be something else, the lines do not drift at all, very stable. I beleive the MedFER beacons run very low power so maybe I can't expect to see them anyway.
Gary,

Thought I had better check NC HiMedfer's frequency.  I found it just a few Hz high of the posted frequency.  It is presently on 1704.980 kHz with the temp an unseasonable 65 deg F.  I have never found it more than a few Hz from this frequency so an Argo 30 dot sec window will find the pattern.  I would guess your chance of catching this signal is very slim to nothing but here's what it looks like:


73,
Dex
 

Regards,

Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp

Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: 05 January 2006 18:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER?

Hmm, I can't quite tell by looking.  Highly unlikely to be a LORAN line at that frequency any more.  On the other hand, 1705 is the upper limit for license-free operation, so if it's a MedFER, someone might have drifted a little out of band.
 
John
 

JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>