Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+G0NBD\s+difficult\s+to\s+decode\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+G0NBD\s+difficult\s+to\s+decode\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:53:42 +0000; Hello LF, I'm seeing really strong signals from G0NBD, and it was decoding earlier, but now I seem to be unable to get a decode from what should be a good string (positive S/N ratio) signal. I see at; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00189.html (8,957 bytes)
2. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:22:32 +0100; Thanks John, Its printing ok off air locally , but I am seeing some 'hash' at about -40 db on the spectrum plot .. this im not sure of ... just checked with digipan as a tone generator imd's are well; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00304.html (10,800 bytes)
3. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:42:52 +0000; Mal, LF, In general WSPR is very good at decoding weak signals - that's what it's all about after all - and can give reliable decodes on signals that are inaudible and only faintly visible on the wat; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00327.html (12,364 bytes)
4. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: brian hodgson <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:33:40 -0800 (PST); signal. I see that Chris G3XVL often reports a +13dB s/n ratio for Jim's signal, which shows that strong signals can decode correctly. The question of brevity in passing information (ie "having a QSO; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00448.html (13,069 bytes)
5. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:36:54 +0100; mal hamilton wrote: Johan I have mentioned this several times before but noone seems to know why strong signals or any visible signals do not DECODE. I get some decodes therefore I know my system is; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00478.html (13,454 bytes)
6. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: "dave.riley3" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:49:28 -0500; We three seem to have met a wayfaring signal last night on 502400 dial, namely on 503980+/- Near the top part of the bandpass window was a fairly strong sig that caused false decodes and uploads whic; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00627.html (10,661 bytes)
7. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:02:30 +0100; I too saw a quite strong signal last night which didn't decode. It was around 503.97 kHz and almost as strong as M0BMU, who was perfectly audible most of the time. There was no "banana effect" on the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00768.html (9,524 bytes)
8. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:28:13 +0000; Okay Graham, I see others reporting inconsistent decodes of you on the chat page at WSPRnet, so it's not just me. The last few have been okay, and weaker. I'm having no trouble with Jim's +5dB signal; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01180.html (9,443 bytes)
9. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:56:36 +0100; Johan I have mentioned this several times before but noone seems to know why strong signals or any visible signals do not DECODE. I get some decodes therefore I know my system is working but not sure; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01251.html (10,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]