To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode |
From: | John P-G <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:28:13 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <459DB6156FCD43509AAB5F5D7282462C@AGB> |
References: | <20090126225342.5af9e594@lurcher> <459DB6156FCD43509AAB5F5D7282462C@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:21:29 -0000 "Graham" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks John, > > Its printing ok off air locally , but I am seeing some 'hash' at > about -40 db Okay Graham, I see others reporting inconsistent decodes of you on the chat page at WSPRnet, so it's not just me. The last few have been okay, and weaker. I'm having no trouble with Jim's +5dB signal, so absolute strength doesn't seem to be the problem, but your sig is certainly easier when it's weaker, which is counterintuitive! Off to bed now, will leave RX running, spots to WSPRnet. GN John |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: WSPR, dave.riley3 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode, Johan H. Bodin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |