David et all: The latest QST has another DDS design with 1 Hz steps that are not quite 1 Hz really, rather sad to see the impact of thinking that can only cope with 1 Hz increments hi. and I checked
In a message dated 1/18/02 5:18:18 AM GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: This is all best done at high level as I see it. The latest QST has another DDS design with 1 Hz steps that are no
Andy, This is too prescriptive. Yes, of course. It was just a thought, not a proposal. I was just dreaming. A clear case of the proverb "It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people think that
I think it's time for you to replace the batteries in your calculator. That's neat! But I make it 0.0083333 Hz resolution, I make it 0.00083333 Hz = 10.0000 mHz / 12. Both are submultiples of 1Hz...
Andy, I think it's time for you to replace the batteries in your calculator. That's neat! But I make it 0.0083333 Hz resolution, I make it 0.00083333 Hz = 10.0000 mHz / 12. Both are submultiples of 1
Andy, That's neat! But I make it 0.0083333 Hz resolution, (still OK nice value though) and can't be locked to a 1PPS signal. Better still, use it with an AD9851 chip using the x6 PLL multiplier for 5
That's neat! But I make it 0.0083333 Hz resolution, (still OK nice value though) and can't be locked to a 1PPS signal. Better still, use it with an AD9851 chip using the x6 PLL multiplier for 50mHz s
Just to repeat a comment that I made last summer... I am using an AD9850 clocked with a 3579.545 kHz crystal pulled to 3579.1394 kHz. This allows integer resolution to 10 mHz. The results have been e
OK. It looks like we already have a standard. Andy, can you describe your protocol? I'll send it out under separate cover. If we all clock our DDS chips with 5 or 10MHz from frequency standards, we w
Please, for serial protocol just use what Andy has already done or do the exact same functions, Integer steps at the limits of the DDS chip. OK. It looks like we already have a standard. Andy, can y
Johan: It would be very nice if we could agree on a simple serial protocol that would allow any PC program, be it DOS or Windoze, to take total control over the DDS (I know that Andy G4JNT has done s
Hello I know there are some DDS users/programmers out there! We have probably not seen the final variant of "sequential single tone modulation" yet. So, in order to avoid unnecessary (and painful) PI
