Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+EbNaut\s+LF\s+test\s+from\s+iz7slz\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: IZ7SLZ <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:02:44 +0100
Good day LF, all some coherent bpsk test transmissions with EbNaut are now scheduled from here (JN80NU) on QRG = 136170.00 Hz every hour starting at 13:00. Message is composed of 16 characters with 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00420.html (9,921 bytes)

2. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:58:39 +0000
My rx is back on from 19th 15:06 UT, recording 135kHz to 138kHz. I couldn't decode the 15:00 message, losing the first 6 minutes was too much. It is quite possible to decode with a third of the messa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00435.html (9,721 bytes)

3. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:36:07 +0000
Nothing decoded at 16:00 either. I looked at 15:20 to 16:00 in 416uHz bandwidth and there is nothing at all. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00437.html (9,604 bytes)

4. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: IZ7SLZ <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:49:35 +0100
Hi Paul, thanks for trying to read my signal. Yes, carrier is ON 2 minutes before and switched OFF about 2 minutes after the EbNaut sequence. I will increase now transmits intervals to 30 mins. All t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00439.html (11,117 bytes)

5. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:10:02 +0000
Nothing here either - I've been recording each 17.4 minute session using sampling rates of 31.25 or 62.5Hz, but the decoder throws up either nothing or a garbage decode with 30% bit errors indicated
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00440.html (11,629 bytes)

6. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:30:39 -0500
Hi Domenico, got your 15, 16 and 17 UT transmissions ok, with Eb/N0 3.1, 11.8 and 9.0 dB respectively. It looks like the symbol timing is a bit over one second late. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) --Ursprün
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00441.html (12,903 bytes)

7. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:43:28 +0000
  got your 15, 16 and 17 UT transmissions ok, with Eb/N0 3.1, 11.8 and 9.0 dB respectively.   It looks like the symbol timing is a bit over one second late.   Best 73, Markus (DF6NM)   --Ursprünglich
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00442.html (13,674 bytes)

8. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:44:05 +0000
. I just tried 17:17:20,+2m in 8.33 mHz and got a nice sharp line on frequency. S/N 17.3 dB in 120 seconds, signal calculator says you should be Eb/N0 = 7.08 dB with that. But no decode of the 17:00
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00443.html (10,559 bytes)

9. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:47:04 +0000
  got your 15, 16 and 17 UT transmissions ok, with Eb/N0 3.1, 11.8 and 9.0 dB respectively.   It looks like the symbol timing is a bit over one second late.   Best 73, Markus (DF6NM)   --Ursprünglich
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00444.html (13,619 bytes)

10. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:02:39 -0500
As far as I can see the transmission is on the nominal frequency. I needed the offset because I had set my center frequency to 136171 Hz, minus 0.0175 Hz due to known RX DDS rounding. The sequences s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00445.html (14,949 bytes)

11. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: IZ7SLZ <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:28:19 +0100
-- In the past, Domenico sometimes suffered from a GPS ambuiguity which gave him a one second clock error.  -- Yes, my clock is derived from Jupiter GPS and its 1_pps signal. Sometimes nmea is late o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00446.html (17,603 bytes)

12. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:47:59 +0000
Finally a decode! From the 18:00 message found rank 0: JS PARIS. IZ7SLZ ps [ 10 90 90 90 90] re-encode 340/1040 ber 3.27e-01 Es/N0=-9.9 Eb/N0=0.4 effrate=1/10.83 This with zero time and frequency off
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00448.html (11,341 bytes)

13. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:12:03 +0000
I'm looking at the 30 minute carrier and there's obviously a problem http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/151119c.gif The main peak is off frequency and it's jumping around a lot. Could be a problem with my ti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00449.html (11,483 bytes)

14. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:42:09 +0000
Definitely a timing problem at my end. http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/151119d.gif shows the time offset reported by my timing program (vttime from vlfrx-tools), during Domenico's 18:00 message. It's havi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00451.html (11,687 bytes)

15. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:53:14 +0000
BINGO !!!!!!!!!    (Text = "GE PAUL TNX RPRT"  in case the graphic below doesn't get thought near Instant decode on the 1930 Transmission Inline images 1 (ignore the Rx frequency showing as 60000, it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00453.html (17,952 bytes)

16. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:02:52 -0500
Paul, interesting spectrum... but before ripping the RX apart I would't rule out propagational Doppler. The main component is half a mHz low which seems reasonable after dusk. The companions are a co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00454.html (13,618 bytes)

17. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:10:02 -0500
Very nice, congratulations! Markus --Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-- Von: Andy Talbot <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Do, 19 Nov 2015 8:55 pm Betreff: R
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00457.html (12,045 bytes)

18. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:29:06 +0000
I see what you mean, the carrier looks quite ragged on there too. I guess I'm used to the nice sharp lines we get a VLF. These super high frequencies are a bit different! But I certainly have a probl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00461.html (12,586 bytes)

19. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:27:34 -0500
Yes, same here when using the show_rawsyms3a utility. The peak in the skyblue spectrum-of-squares will conveniently guide you to the correct frequency and time offset if Eb/N0 is above 4 dB or so. T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00463.html (14,142 bytes)

20. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: IZ7SLZ <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 22:33:58 +0100
Thank you Andy for the report and many compliments for your receiver. Just for another test, transmission in progress (21:30 UT) is formed by 39 characters at 0.5s. Total duration is 17'52". Let's se
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00464.html (21,056 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu