Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+477\s+A\s+local\s+SSB\s+chat\s+band\s+\?\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:30:44 +0000 (GMT)
Geri 800 Hz B/W ... May be this is something 'Wolf' can code for you ? a b/w compression / expansion module in SL , to limit the tx b/w to 800 Hz must be possible to divide by 3 and mult by 3 with a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00500.html (24,111 bytes)

22. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:08:18 +0100
In that short SSB test , it was quit evident that the propagation characteristics of the band , assumedly in terms of ground wave are actually quite unique and offer very good short to medium range R
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00507.html (15,363 bytes)

23. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 21:36:57 +0100
Hi, I kind of like the idea of an SSB channel. I just pulled out the conditions of my first secial license for 160m from 1973 or 1974. That said 1815 to 1835 kHz with 10 Watts in CW, additionally one
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00519.html (18,919 bytes)

24. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:43:07 +0000 (GMT)
In that short SSB test , it was quit evident that the propagation characteristics of the band , assumedly in terms of ground wave are actually quite unique and offer very good short to medium range
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00545.html (21,014 bytes)

25. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:30:58 +0100
Yes Warren Bob told me he has a ssb net 510 520 , could be done this side , but I'm not sure all the allocations allow voice which sstv mode did you use , did you find any preferable one , 3 Khz ? or
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00571.html (19,807 bytes)

26. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:09:51 +0100
Am 03.01.2013 21:02, schrieb M0FMT: [...] If I was the authority I would have only CW and no other modes on 630m. Hi Pete, Really? Well, i bet for G.. it would be only SSB and Opera ;-) For me it wou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00573.html (13,025 bytes)

27. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:05:48 +0100
Hi Colin, Good point. Am 04.01.2013 09:24, schrieb M5FRA - Colin: [...] As an ex G8 who learned Morse in spite of a chronic medical condition I would say just get on a do it. The rewards are well wor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00577.html (10,214 bytes)

28. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:47:51 +0200
That was SM6BHZ on 508kHz LSB Hi Graham Geri and all   Warren has seen SSB first hand on the MF QRG and we have this side also.There was an SM station (call sign forgotten?) in the early days of 500 
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00618.html (18,443 bytes)

29. Re[3]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:07:20 +0000
I am sorry but I did not express myself very clearly in the last couple of posts and there were lots of typos. I will attempt to explain why I am opposed to digital voice/SSB on 630m. <?xml:namespace
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00628.html (13,326 bytes)

30. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:21:53 +0000 (GMT)
Quite intriguing propagation on this 'new' band From some unexpected early 600 mile + Opera decodes last night , to several wspr TA decodes , [G8's again ..] to today's test with Gary using USB-SSB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00632.html (13,484 bytes)

31. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:02:02 +0000 (GMT)
Hi <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> Not sure if that comment is directed at me but I was adding my ten cents worth to an earlier comment. There is no manda
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00639.html (31,517 bytes)

32. RE: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 22:59:20 +0100
Hi Gery, depending on the antenna/matching sytem Q some might have a SWR-BW issue,i.e. not enough bandwidth (3kHz) with a decent swr for SSB. Lossy sytems would be better in this respect... I remembe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00667.html (16,002 bytes)

33. Re[5]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:19:31 +0000
Pete, I live within the law and hope I have respect for other people and users of the spectrum. Your attitude to band plans is a perfect example of what is wrong with the hobby. Colin - M5FRA m5fra.o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00737.html (17,034 bytes)

34. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:19:02 +0100
Dave Well nice it would be , that I could extract 5 w erp from my 40 x 70 ft inv L , with 100 watts pep drive , I beg to differ , one of the salient features of the 600mtr band , would appear to be e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00758.html (14,786 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu