Hi Graham, OK, but most people are just transmitting beacon signals! I would not even have the time to do a real QSO in QRSS-60 but this is not the issue. We are talking about beacon transmissions li
On 9/9/2010 9:45 PM, Stefan Schäfer wrote: OK, but most people are just transmitting beacon signals! I would not even have the time to do a real QSO Yes, this is the whole point. IMHO QSOs are for ra
It looks like Stefan is ATTACKING anyone that does not agree with his point of view. I find it difficult to envisage using QRS600 when already this past several years faster speeds have proved adequ
Mal, If you would spend half of the time you take each day writing nerving mails, you could at least transmit your full callsign each day in DFCW-600! Roger/G3XBM has once written a comment that hits
So it's a case of managing to cross the pond .... and then give up ? Tony, EI8JK. On 09/09/2010 19:31, mal hamilton wrote: -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] mal hamilton To: rsgb_l
Assuming this is right .. qrss 600 will have a dit length of 600 seconds = 10 minuets and at 3:1 dit/dash dash = 30 minuets , it would take over 1 hour to invite the other side to TX ...the sun would
It looks like Stefan is ATTACKING anyone that does not agree with his point of view. I find it difficult to envisage using QRS600 when already this past several years faster speeds have proved adequa
