Re: LF: : Request for modification of Argo Time base

[Stefan Schäfer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>]

Mal,

If you would spend half of the time you take each day writing nerving mails, you could at least transmit your full callsign each day in DFCW-600!

Roger/G3XBM has once written a comment that hits the nail on the head (01AUG2010):
Mal,

Grow up and stop seeking attention like a two year old child throwing toys out of the pram. Your positive contributions are appreciated. Your jibes only make you sound a total idiot.

Please think about this before each mail you are sending and verify it's content!


73, Stefan

PS: I will forgive you ;-)


Am 09.09.2010 20:31, schrieb mal hamilton:

 

----- Original Message -----

From: mal hamilton

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 7:18 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Request for modification of Argo Time base

Stefan

If you need qrs 600 to communicate GIVE UP,  its a ridiculous request, no one has that amount of time to wait for a single digit. Think how long it would take for a proper QSO.

You are a late comer to LF and must understand the oceans have already been spanned at speeds around  QRS 60 and faster. A proper engineered station can communicate with the USA and Russia on normal CW. I have already achieved this on CW and QRS 3.

g3kev

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Stefan Schäfer

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 5:37 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Request for modification of Argo Time base

Hello Alberto,

I have a question too: Is it possible to add a "QRSS-600" and/or a "QRSS-300" mode? Many OMs are using your program which does a good job (just as Rik's QRS program for transmitting). Those who want to RX a VLF transmission in DFCW-600 cannot do that in ARGO currently.

If it would be easy and no problem for you to give out a new release, it could be interesting for some :-)

Best 73!

Stefan/DK7FC