|
It looks like Stefan is ATTACKING anyone that does
not agree with his point of view.
I find it difficult to envisage using QRS600 when
already this past several years faster speeds have proved adequate to cross the
Atlantic and beyond.
however
if others favour 600 good luck but I can manage
without it.
and don't forget the POP UP CALENDAR and beware of
the dreaded QSB during the month long qso !!
G3KEV
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:45
PM
Subject: Re: LF: : Request for
modification of Argo Time base
Hi Graham,
OK, but most people are just transmitting
beacon signals! I would not even have the time to do a real QSO in QRSS-60 but
this is not the issue. We are talking about beacon transmissions like WD2XGJ
or OE5ODL does it each night. RA3YO is transmitting "Y" in DFCW 60. So, if you
receive 10x "Y" you could receive 1x "Y" in one night with 10 dB better
S/N. But the thing is, that this 10 dB S/N can make the difference between
receiving a weak trace (positive reception) and receiving nothing at all!
Transmitting "Y" in DFCW-600 takes about 44 minutes which is no problem!
People can think about that and may choose their personal wanted QRSS/DFCW
mode :-)
Ask Jim/M0BMU about his reception of my signal on VLF. He
keeps the 2nd best RX distance at all on VLF! Ask what he would have received
if choosing QRSS-60 (about 45 mHz FFT). He has taken the time to drive out of
the noise and got a doubtless positive reception. If i would have transmitted
QRSS-60, it would have been "lost" time and energy, for him and for
me!
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 09.09.2010 21:08, schrieb Graham:
Assuming this is right .. qrss 600
will have a dit length of 600 seconds = 10
minuets and at 3:1 dit/dash dash = 30 minuets ,
it would take over 1 hour to invite the other
side to TX ...the sun would be shining by then and
game over !
Not often but this time may be
its One , Nill to the elder statesman
|
|
