Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 808 ]

Total 808 documents matching your query.

361. Re: LF: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 18:10:16 -0500
Peter, I thought that was a typo! That shows conditions are reasonable Well, they were... right into the middle of Laurie's "3". Haven't seen anything since. John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00177.html (9,838 bytes)

362. Re: LF: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 17:43:39 -0500
Peter, Up and running on 72.339kHz That's 72.399, correct? Not seeing anything there yet, but appear to be in the middle of Laurie's first "G". John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00180.html (9,828 bytes)

363. LF: Re: 73 kHz Wednesday night (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:49:53 -0500
Andre, John, can the AMRAD gang come and camp in your backyard, or shall we all have to move permanently to Massachusetts :-) You'd hate it! I am as totally perplexed about this as I can be. This is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00191.html (10,979 bytes)

364. LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 09:51:30 -0500
Laurie, Well I have achieved what I set out to do,so would be happy to stop the beacon now if anyone wants to have a go. But I am aware that there are others who were looking for my signal, Dex for e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00193.html (11,093 bytes)

365. Re: LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:57:31 -0500
Dex, I just reviewed my overnight screen captures of Laurie's frequency. Absolutely nothing received here in North Carolina. John, are you using one of those wave magnets antennas I have seen adverti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00195.html (11,360 bytes)

366. LF: Re: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:01:22 -0500
Correction: 22 November, UTC. John Andrews, W1TAG (west side of the Pond...)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00205.html (9,445 bytes)

367. LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:36:48 -0500
Below is a screen shot of G3AQC on 72.4013 kHz taken at W1TAG on 21Nov01 from about 0025 to 0120 UTC. This is from ARGO, in 90 sec/dot mode. I tried 120 sec/dot, but there was blurring between succes
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00207.html (9,862 bytes)

368. LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:00:52 -0500
Laurie, et al: OK - Here's one hot off the press from tonight (Wednesday) from 6-7 PM EST. There's a little receiver warm-up at the start. The 799.5 line would represent 72.4015 kHz. Note the smearin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00209.html (8,421 bytes)

369. LF: 73 kHz, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:28:11 -0500
Laurie, Boy, what a signal here tonight. Will send a screen shot when I get a full screen. At ARGO's 120 sec/dot resolution, that takes a while! John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00211.html (7,972 bytes)

370. Re: LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:47:59 -0500
Laurie, Thanks John, I will go for the complete call now (dont want any criticism !) Would it not be better to use 90 or even 120sec Argo at your end to ensure maximum SNR.Alternately I could shorten
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00225.html (9,745 bytes)

371. LF: Re: RE: Re. 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:50:34 -0500
Andy, What's your locator, or preferably NGR, Laurie, and your eight/ten digit locator (or Lat / Long ) if you have it John I'm at work -- have the lat/long info at home, and can send it tonight. Joh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00228.html (8,292 bytes)

372. Re: LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:32:09 -0500
David, Errr, don't you need a complete call for a 'world record' ? However, that must be just a matter of a few more nights. Not a bad point. Conditions were such that a full call sign should have be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00231.html (9,018 bytes)

373. LF: Re: Re. 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:27:54 -0500
Laurie, Conditions were considerably better last night on 72 kHz than anything I've seen so far this season. Hopefully, if we can stay away from unusual solar activity, we may be able to continue the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00232.html (8,656 bytes)

374. LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:27:44 -0500
I did copy Laurie's 72.401 kHz transmission last night, with parts of the signal being visible from 2330 to 0700 Z. There were half hour periods with and without recognizable characters. The best cop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00242.html (10,097 bytes)

375. LF: G3AQC (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:44:11 -0500
Laurie, It appears that I've at least got pieces of "AQC" on screen captures from this evening. Will evaluate in the morning (U.S. time), and let you know. It's been a long day! John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00251.html (8,081 bytes)

376. LF: Re: Re 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:51:27 -0500
Laurie, Hi Dex John and all, No beacon tonight, cndx not good. Will advise when things improve. 73s Noted. Nothing heard 2300 - 0230 last night. Seemed noisier than the previous evening. John Andrews
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00279.html (9,066 bytes)

377. LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 10:16:19 -0500
Laurie, I will run the beacon tonight (and tomorrow all being well) Freq.72.401/2 kHz, DFCW 120sec dots. Starting 2300utc through to 0730. 73s Nothing seen from 2300 to 0300 utc. Will look again toni
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00291.html (9,847 bytes)

378. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:06:19 -0500
Have you actually looked? Yessir... I'm in the telcom equipment business. I'm not claiming that you're wrong, Larry... just that the normal U.S. ringing signal is plain old 20 Hz AC. John Andrews, W
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00345.html (9,577 bytes)

379. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:57:26 -0500
Larry, I'm with John Davis on this one. The U.S. practice is 20 Hz for ringing -- nothing at 1 kHz. John Andrews, W1TAG Larry, I have done. My statement was based on having checked it personally on a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00349.html (9,543 bytes)

380. LF: Re: Propagation (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:48:44 -0500
Alan, This CME will affect the LF conditions on or around Thursday , but a big CME from Sunday's flare should arrive by about Wednesday 7th and will start to have an effect on the LF bands by about S
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00372.html (9,363 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu