Hi MIke, Am 08.10.2010 11:29, schrieb Mike Dennison: Well, it is possible but I can't confirm it. I think many LF operators have had small fires because of the very high voltages (especially on the o
Hello Michel, Your reception is very impressive. Can i get the 1 GB recording? ;-) And your SpecLab settings would be interesting too. I've seen, your SNR is just 10 dB less than on my own grabber in
Dear VLF, This sunday, SAQ @ 17.2 kHz will transmit again, as already announced (http://www.alexander.n.se/). I have set up a usr file for receiving SAQ in SpecLab. Yes i know, there is the SAQrx pro
Piotr, I just saw that i misunderstood something: I do not need to include the reduced antenna efficiency since it is already included, since the calculation is for 1 A Antenna current, right? So the
Hi Alan, Thank you. Yes, i know your website from the early 2000s (as i was young) where i have read all i have found in the web ;-) Yes, a notch filter for 125 kHz is not so critical than a band pas
Hello Jay/W1VD, Sorry, i cannot send my answer to you. I get this message when the mail is returned: __________________________ -- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -- <jrusgrove@co
Dear LF, Today i have done some measurements on my "earth antenna" at 137 kHz. The antenna was used as a ground loop antenna (far end grounded) and as a inv-L antenna (far end ungrounded). Winthin th
Hi Daniele, LF, Am 06.10.2010 12:34, schrieb Daniele Tincani: I don't want to annoy you and the LF/VLF group with all these detailed questions, anyway I noticed that bits/sample is set to 16, while m
Well done Roger and Paul-Henrik! I haven't thought that this is possible, almost not even on 160m. We want to see more of these tests, Roger :-) Good luck and fun! BTW, what is your next step? Any ne
Yes. I've been in email contact with him (having built his LF converter in 2003) before some months and asked why he didn't at least stay at LF since there are no contests and no SSB and so. Here, th
Hi Rik, Very interesting! Looks easy, almost perfect. But i don't know what is the "best" solution now. It gets confusing the more solutions become available. Probably each method can achieve optimal
Wow! Dear VLF, This was very nice to read. So many messages and so many positive receptions. I am really impressed! Many thanks to you all who have been active on this day, watching on 8,97 kHz, the
Hello Markus, VLF, Yes, indeed. 10 dB S/N in 47 µHz :-) Unbelivable! This indicates that your transmitter and my receiver must be quite accurate ;-) Markus, here we may achieve some very import
Dear VLF, Attached you find the results of Paul Nicholson of my 8th VLF experiment. Interesting links and he seems to confirm that my frequency is pretty accurate now ;-) Furthermore the first part g
Hello Rik, Am 25.10.2010 16:08, schrieb Rik Strobbe: Hello Stefan, congrats with the effort and the results. I really must try to participate in the next test (although the distance between us in mea
Hello Michel, I have successfully downloaded your wav file and can analyse it now :-) It would be interesting for me what your Speclab settings have been. Could you send me the usr file as well? Mayb
Dear VLF, I have updated my website at http://www.qrz.com/db/DK7FC with some photos and a short summary. If you are interested, take a look at it ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC
It seems the Alpha TX at 11904 Hz is/are not completely OFF but rather about 25 dB weaker in the moment! I still receive a signal, 20 dB above noise in 176 µHz here... 73, Stefan Am 26.10.2010 13:40,
Hi Laurence, This looks very interesting. I have never seen such a wideband window (as i call it) from across the pond. You can even see DHO38 at good strength, interesting! Could you change the scro
Hi Daniele, OK, i will set up the usr file. But it is nothing special, since we want to display the sferics, we won't have a blanker and/or clipper and no filtering and no sample rate drift correctio
