Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

1. LF: QRS keyer (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 10:42:24 +1100
G'day All, Can anyone point me in the direction of a DOS-based QRS keyer? I was browsing and found a link to one in a file called "qrs.zip". Unfortunately, the link didn't respond. To make things wor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-02/msg00011.html (8,484 bytes)

2. LF: Re: QRS keyer (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:03:32 +1100
G'day All, Thanks to all those who replied to my query about a QRS keyer. The information/programs supplied reminded me that I have an old TRS80 Model 100 lying in the back of a cupboard just waiting
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00001.html (8,317 bytes)

3. LF: Care and feeding of a top-loaded vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 18:24:55 +1100
G'day All, Having recently received permission for operating an experimental transmitter from this location on LF, I am now faced with the problem of erecting an LF transmitting antenna. Although in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00025.html (11,267 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Care and feeding of a top-loaded vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:07:56 +1100
G'day Marco, Thanks for the info. I take your point about variation in feedpoint impedance with WX. The only reason I was concerned about matching was in regard to wringing the most out of TX. On wha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00033.html (9,595 bytes)

5. LF: Re: LF - early April 1st question (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 18:45:01 +1100
G'day All, I know I am a little early for the 1st of April, but what ever happened to the revolutionary CFA (crossed field antenna) ? There was a series of articles on the 'net promising many things
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00121.html (9,049 bytes)

6. LF: Re: CFA (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:49:03 +1100
Oh Dear, what a kaffuffle! My enquiry after the CFA certainly provoked a wide range of responses! Ranging from professorial admonishings to construction details. Johan, I think you should apologise f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00146.html (8,680 bytes)

7. LF: Multiple Tuned Vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 08:09:32 +1000
G'day All, Here is my two cents worth... I think that there is not a great deal to be gained from using multiple-tuned verticals. The reason I think that is that if you look at the aim of improving o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00157.html (12,406 bytes)

8. LF: Re: SV: Multiple Tuned Vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:51:53 +1000
If six such antennas are parallelled, the total loss resistance becomes 1/6 while the radiation resistance remains unchanged. The total impedance is now 0,45 ohm due to reduced losses. The antenna i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00163.html (10,519 bytes)

9. LF: Re: Eclipse Monitoring (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 08:41:17 +1000
G'day Renato, Excellent site!! I found it very interesting and food for thought. Thanks!! 73s Steve Olney (VK2ZTO/AXSO - QF56IK : Lat -33 34 07, Long +150 44 40) == LowFer URL: http://www.zeta.org.au
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00174.html (8,217 bytes)

10. LF: FDK tests (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 12:08:27 +1000
G'day All, Have just finished putting up some information about FDK (Frequency Difference Keying). If you are interested use the link in the sidebar on my main page at:- http://www.zeta.org.au/~ollan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00067.html (8,362 bytes)

11. LF: Re: visual-CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 11:13:25 +1100
G'day Rik, I can indeed confirm that this slow visual CW works. It was one of my early attempts to figure out a way of improving the S/N on LF paths. It had one tone for the "dots" and one for the "d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00052.html (11,075 bytes)

12. LF: Re: RE: CFA (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 08:12:42 +1100
G'day All, IMHO, I think it would be wise to wait until the Isle of Man transmitter is tested. Am I wrong but doesn't the latest coverage map from the IoM site look a lot smaller than the old one? 73
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00074.html (8,644 bytes)

13. LF: Re: Re: RE: CFA (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 09:43:38 +1100
G'day All, Am I wrong but doesn't the latest coverage map from the IoM site look a lot smaller than the old one? Yes I am wrong, it is only a little smaller :-) IMHO the IoM antenna will be deemed to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00075.html (12,448 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: Re: RE: CFA (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 07:18:09 +1100
G'day Väinö, Real hams don't worry about blood pressures.... Tsk, Tsk... Hams are supposed to be kind and considerate to others :-) CFA debate has been going on for about 10 years now especially on N
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00100.html (9,805 bytes)

15. Re: LF: VCW by ON7YD (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 07:30:44 +1100
G'day All, Prompted by the discussions here on the VCW method described by Rik I have resurrected the code that I used to test this method earlier this year. As the code was all there from these earl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00147.html (8,728 bytes)

16. LF: VFSKCW stuff... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:01:38 +1100
G'day All, To add a bit more info about VFSKCW, some advantages I noted in the earlier experiments (I haven't done any lately) was that under marginal conditions (e.g. QRN) I found VFSKCW easier to c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00149.html (9,355 bytes)

17. LF: Re: new version of QRS supports FDK (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 06:55:05 +1100
G'day All, I just got a new 'beta' version of QRS ready that supports FDK. Those who want to test it are requested to send me a mail (direct, not via reflector). I have written to Rik and explained t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00158.html (10,322 bytes)

18. LF: VFSKCW Version 2... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:14:26 +1100
G'day All, Have just uploaded version 2 of VFSKCW. Messages are now saved from one session to another. You have provision for changing the size of the offset between tones (to match different dot per
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00170.html (8,901 bytes)

19. LF: Re: RE vfskcw....help files? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 06:35:12 +1100
G'day Alan, Yes, as pointed out in part iii of the the Notes on the download page, some parts of the package have yet to be done. I am working on them :-) Should be available in the next version. Any
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00195.html (8,406 bytes)

20. LF: VFSKCW Version 3... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 09:00:33 +1100
G'day All, I have just posted Version 3 of VFSKCW. It now includes a help file as well incorporating shaped tones to minimise keying clicks. This will be all for now until I get enough interest to ad
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00197.html (8,648 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu