Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 117 ]

Total 117 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:15:37 +0000
... except the ones you couldn't hear. Beverages are not efficient on RX either but have directional advantages. I have never missed any DX signals by not having one. G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00033.html (10,168 bytes)

22. Re: LF: 40 years (completely OT, but...) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 04:03:03 +0000
My first uA709 (first real commercial op-amp, circa 1968) cost me five quid. Which was a LOT of newspapers. Unstable, noisy. And, with its unprotected output stage didn't last very long . . . 73 Stev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00527.html (10,032 bytes)

23. Re: LF: mains wires (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:11:01 +0000
Agreed. Here in the US a current(!) copy of the NEC (National Electrical Code) is an essential night-stand accoutrement. And ditto on the isolated work-bench/radio supply. Add to that a mondo UPS and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00249.html (11,005 bytes)

24. Re: LF: Sound blaster issues or maybe a Dell.... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:16:59 +0000
Hi Laurence, Just a stab: it's unlikely an oscillator is coming up on different frequencies but it may be that in one 'mode' it's using the USB device's clock and in the other cuddly Widnows is nicel
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00106.html (10,971 bytes)

25. Re: LF: 16 bit vs 24 bit ADC? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:43:14 +0000
Hi Bill, Audio afficionados are high on opinion but notoriously hard-put to show statistically significant discrimination in true ABX or ABC scenarios; I wouldn't be using them as any sort of criteri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00408.html (17,334 bytes)

26. Re: LF: Re: Flex 3000 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:24:34 +0000
Hi Mal, The Firewire adapter, still readily available, must use the TI (Texas Instruments) chipset to work satisactorily with the Flex. Do a search in the usual places - those that use the TI chipset
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00168.html (10,457 bytes)

27. Re: LF: Titanic Frequency (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:00:26 +0000
Good find, Dave. Thanks! 73 Steve On 4/15/2012 2:10 PM, DAVE PICK wrote: According to all the information on the Marconi historical sites it would have been 600m. The installation on the Titanic coul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00007.html (10,292 bytes)

28. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:17:04 +0000
Greetings, The constituency, expertise and variety on this group is magnificent and we mess with this at our peril. The benefits of a Yahoo group over the venerable Blacksheep are plain. That's _A_ Y
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00422.html (13,379 bytes)

29. Re: LF: Copying CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 13:47:48 -0400
Hi Mike, Ooooh, analogue. I remember that. Possibly still available (I checked the Digikey book without success, but RS etc. maybe?) would be bucket-brigade delay lines, which were used extensively f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00079.html (10,421 bytes)

30. Re: LF: Copying CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:45:13 -0400
Hi Mike, Reticon was who I meant, however they seemed to have skipped out of that town, too. A further 30 seconds perusal of the Digikey book turned up a bunch of Panasonic parts of various lengths a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00080.html (11,278 bytes)

31. Re: LF: VE1ZZ signals (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:42:28 -0500
Greetings, Congratulations Peter and Jack! Well, the King of Topband now rules 136, too. Last night Jack was the loudest amateur signal (out of a total of, um, five) that I've seen so far here in cen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00191.html (9,557 bytes)

32. Re: LF: Re: REALITY CHECK (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:43:13 -0500
Greetings, G3KEV: "There is magic connected with the old Cinema and the ability to send/copy morse code." Don't get me wrong here - I'm a CW dude through and through, and love movies - but you should
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00141.html (8,462 bytes)

33. LF: G3LDO copied at W3EEE (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 00:07:06 -0500
Greetings, Peter's call unmistakeable around .920-and-change at about 0430z Sun. Feb. 11th. '01 here in _very_ windy PA. Cheers, Steve
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00389.html (7,879 bytes)

34. LF: Feb 8th., and morse 'fist' (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 12:13:26 -0500
Greetings, fellow static-heads, Rather noisy last night, a few obvious 'squigglies' evident, but not enough (other than frequency) on which to hang a hat. Tonight we are supposedly in for thunderstor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00419.html (8,127 bytes)

35. LF: G3XTZ copied at W3EEE 0400z+/- Feb.7th. (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 13:35:06 -0500
Greetings, I have just confirmed with Graham that he, indeed, is the owner of the "XTZ" snapped for posterity by Argo last night. Man, it was exciting watching the grass grow NONONO! real morse chara
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00474.html (8,774 bytes)

36. Re: LF: VK, ZL LF allocation (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:40:40 -0400
Hi Jim, This 'gap' may not last long; there is a Dutch LW station slated for 171kHz, if they ever get a station together. They were I believe chased off land by conservationists and last I heard goin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00085.html (9,238 bytes)

37. LF: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:59:20 -0400
Greetings, A couple of months ago the "which receiver?" thing came up over here, too. The attached below is a message I sent one of the guys (he was toying with getting a TS-440S, with which he is re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00011.html (10,399 bytes)

38. LF: Odd Doings on Longwave (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:00:33 -0400
Greetings, This plays into the relevance of LF broadcast antenna directionality, a la Saarlouis-to-ZL, long-or-short path. Playing with a new untuned loop (late) last night it was quite a 'good' nigh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00093.html (9,014 bytes)

39. LF: Rugby (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 16:56:10 -0400
Greetings, Just a thought. Can anyone describe to me what Rugby at 73k-ish 'looks' like? Or better yet, have an Argo snapshot? (Might be an idea to have snapshots of 'all the usual suspects' such as
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00000.html (7,218 bytes)

40. Re: LF: Re: Re.73KHz beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 11:26:07 -0400
Hi Laurie, Parked a rig on 71.9215 as well, using a loop that gets WWV on 60kHz very well. Nada, sorry. As John remarked, very noisy. So noisy in fact that except for a good lift at about 0500z even
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00003.html (8,291 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu