To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Titanic Frequency |
From: | Steve Dove <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:00:26 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <CAO19VgOncP_4WA0VNPJUwwFFeDkEmdTiK0Jzwnd3YKWxR16GbQ@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO19VgOncP_4WA0VNPJUwwFFeDkEmdTiK0Jzwnd3YKWxR16GbQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 |
Good find, Dave. Thanks! 73 Steve On 4/15/2012 2:10 PM, DAVE PICK wrote: According to all the information on the Marconi historical sites it would have been 600m. The installation on the Titanic could use LW (600m) or SW (300m) bands but was set to 600m when it went down. http://marconigraph.com/titanic/wireless/mgy_wireless.html Dave G3YXM No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4337 - Release Date: 04/14/12 18:34:00 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Titanic Frequency, DAVE PICK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: in memoriam Titanic, pws |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Titanic Frequency, DAVE PICK |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 8970 Hertz this weekend in Appingedam, uwe-jannsen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |