Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Titanic Frequency

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Titanic Frequency
From: pa3abk <pa3abk@kpnmail.nl>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:49:11 +0200
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23TvUM3huobbPrTacZkLqYYVv=C8L3YPUqzoQQNBjh=46Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120415104118.xw4cii7ibk00ow0o@webmail.senselan.ch> <CAA8k23TvUM3huobbPrTacZkLqYYVv=C8L3YPUqzoQQNBjh=46Q@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
Nice question.
My friend Google couldn't produce an instant answer.
What I know is that they used to have two frequency bands in use: 300m & 600m.
Knowing that the MGY was a modern vessel assume he had both and he 
certainly should have produced his CQD on all frequencies available.
http://marconigraph.com/titanic/wireless/mgy_wireless.html

As Andy pointed out, sparktransmitters do have wideband, when a couple of stations were in the air the spectra was well occupied.
There was also a certain "isolation" between Marconi and non-Marconi 
stations, which they didn't improve the initial contacts and QSP.
The 600m came official alive after the disaster.

BTW The company I work for, still has of a wirelesstation in the showroom from those days (1916).
A Telefunken spark transmitter working on both 300m & 600m.
It's quite an eye catcher between all the modern stuff and a good marketing tool :-)
Jan/pa3abk


On 15-4-2012 10:52, Andy Talbot wrote:
It was using spark wasn't it ?
So an early spread spectrum transmission

Centre frequency based on antenna resonance ?

'jnt


On 15 April 2012 08:41,<traumwandler@sensemail.ch>  wrote:
Does anybody know, on which frequency the titanic sent the SOS? Was it really
500kc/s?
73 de Toni, HB9ASB



--
pa3abk<->  dordrecht jo21it



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>