Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

101. Re: LF: D-Layer Chart (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 16:18:31 EDT
<< I don't get any colours on the map, just a yellow diamond. Does anyone know how to make this chart work? >> I believe John Sexton is correct in saying that it is working. According to the tabulate
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00056.html (8,371 bytes)

102. Re: LF: Measurement of antenna current (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 15:26:16 EDT
Steve, I don't recall whether you ever mentioned what the length is of your coil. Is it an appreciable fraction of the overall antenna height? Also, I seem to recollect that some of the discussion in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00252.html (9,272 bytes)

103. Re: LF: static build up on aerials (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:34:44 EDT
<< Based on that I decided never ever to leave a coax connected to a 'floating' wire antenna in the shack. The arcs probably won't hurt anyone, but they could start a fire. >> They certainly could do
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00081.html (8,270 bytes)

104. Re: LF: Re: "Ground" losses (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 23:29:01 EDT
<< This post was in anticipation of getting the band stateside.. I agree.. for receive I would use multiturn loops or a Flag antenna. So I was wonder how well something like this would work for Xmit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00265.html (9,031 bytes)

105. Re: LF: Re: "Ground" losses (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 17:13:27 EDT
<< I have a location on my property where I could run a flat top antenna of perhaps 70 to 80 feet high with a top hat made of parallel wires at least 200 feet long. I have a tower on my property that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00268.html (9,054 bytes)

106. Re: LF: Fw: Near field of 9kHz antenna (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:19:24 EDT
Hi Dick, Are you able to send the GIF as a standard file attachment? I have to reject embedded images in e-mail, but would be glad to download separate attachments. 73, John KD4IDY
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00122.html (8,017 bytes)

107. Re: LF: RE: Re: LF/Hyper test (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:52:59 EDT
<< But they are not radiating it though, just compressing a lot of hot air. Unless some of the grain orientated, directional, oxgen free copper cables the Hi-Fi buffs claim are necessary have some ma
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00133.html (8,534 bytes)

108. Re: LF: Lightning (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 17:41:18 EDT
<< I have chosen to ground the antenna in a separate ground stake, with no connection to the main station gnd. >> This strikes me (no pun intended) as a very good idea. In broadcast practice, our mas
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00229.html (10,443 bytes)

109. Re: LF: The CFA Antenna (again...) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:33:44 EDT
I might add, the W0KPH site shows what appear to be electrically short loaded vertical dipoles, which have nothing to do with the claimed principle of operation of the EH antenna, so far as I can see
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00191.html (7,964 bytes)

110. Re: LF: The CFA Antenna (again...) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:24:15 EDT
<< Hmmmmm - very interesting - I can't wait to see the legal battle over patent infringements! >> You mean, of course, in jurisdictions where neither device has to be demonstrated to actually work be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00192.html (10,280 bytes)

111. Re: LF: General coverage Rx bands (Off Topic) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 23:34:51 EDT
<< I think that there is still quite a lot of analogue in less populated regions. The digital coverage is very variable, particularly the GSM service. >> Stewart is all too correct in this statement,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00108.html (8,313 bytes)

112. Re: LF: Long Wave Broadcasting (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 23:43:56 EDT
Hi Doc, That's quite a collection of questions...and an even bigger list of reflectors it's posted to...but I'll try to answer what I can here. Longwave broadcasters do have to limit the maximum modu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00152.html (11,320 bytes)

113. Re: LF: What is it? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 20:15:28 EDT
<< There is a silent majority about that knows exactly what is going on and one of these days the bubble could burst, when the majority point out to the the RA what is really happening,,,, a lot of a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00040.html (9,489 bytes)

114. Re: LF: The Word (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 23:16:39 EDT
<< Are woman alowed or should i build one myself? >> Do you have construction plans? Are they in a form you could e-mail, or will you be posting them on the Web site? 73 and :-) John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00117.html (8,163 bytes)

115. Re: LF: Re: Farewell, LFers (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:30:11 EDT
<< I'm a bit surprised that a 'gadget' like a 136kHz - 144MHz transponder creates that much reactions and even makes some of us to dismantle their LF antennas. ...snip... >> My thoughts, for what lit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00202.html (10,064 bytes)

116. Re: LF: HAARP & NASA & Hearing Meteors (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:53:09 EST
Andy wrote: >And is the energy contained in a larger meteor flash enough to produce sound at 100km distance considering that the EM field to sound conversion efficiency cannot be particularly high ?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00019.html (9,313 bytes)

117. Re: LF: HAARP & NASA (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:34:09 EST
<< Apparently some folks heard meteors as they flashed by. The link is to a NASA article which is light and yet technical. >> This is one of the things we alerted people to on the home page at lwca.o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00033.html (8,501 bytes)

118. Re: LF: Re: QRSS (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:20:31 EST
Yes. It is not my idea. I got it from the Lowfer mail reflector a week or two ago. I think Les Rayburn, N1LF, "invented" it but I am not sure. > Hi, Johan. Just for sake of historical accuracy, it w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00070.html (8,743 bytes)

119. Re: LF: My error..... (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 00:36:41 EST
Thanks for the clarification, Larry. That's most enlightening. I must say, I hadn't thought of the PL application for the 1000Hz tone. Last time I had any contact with such a network was a quarter ce
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00144.html (8,203 bytes)

120. Re: LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:12:37 EST
Magnificent!
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00212.html (8,518 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu