Stefan; I notice you always use DFCW. I also noticed John Andrews does too the last time I saw him on 73. Yes I think it is easy for me to change. I use the ON7YD [hope I have his call correct] progr
Stefan; I can go anywhere from 68 to 76 kHz. Hartmut told me use 74.549-you think 73.5588 better? Maybe nearer the CFH station that is 40 over nine here at times! What you hearing or see on 74.549? D
Rik; Good to meet you here. I always have used your program. I am having a bit of trouble with CW ID. The dits sometime don't come out at all or very short dits for the ID is there something I can do
Thanks G for all your help-it is new territory for sure-Bob From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:57:02 +0100 Subject: Re: LF: 74.550 TX freq 73 Dia
G; I was surprised to see the several db sigs strength in last nites decodes from the same station indicating QSB [skywave]. Gonna hope for some skip to get the sigs out there! Bob From: g8fzk@g8fzk.
G; The rig here ran flawlessly last night. Full power all night the program ran great. I got a call from my son and he said he couldn't find the download for the program. I looked and it is very diff
Hartmut; You make it look easy!!! That station on 74.548 is WG2XRS/5, Dex in South Carolina. I am sure you will see him when condx favor his area. Really great capture-this time I have my transmitter
Gary et all... It would appear to me that down around my original freq used for QRSS is best. To stay out of the QRSS region I am going to try a dial freq of 71.000 kHz and 72.500 TX freq. F6CNI sugg
Gary; I am getting conflicting reports from everyone. F6CNI says TX on 74.550. You show light splatter there. Not much but 72.4 area is cleaner. I just got an e mail from JD @ [email protected] and J
Stefan; I recall you had an old PC. What did you pick up for your new unit? Bob > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:47:45 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]
Stefan; It is same here. But you can't do everything-transmit and receive at same time no go. I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung less than two years old. Big difference from
Stefan; I have had great results using even an old Heath-kit SWR meter! > Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:34:52 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subj
Markus; I am following Graham's [G0NBD] instruction to move higher. He said set upper sideband exciter to 73.000 and should be on 74.44-5 am not sure if actual transmit freq is 74.4 or if tone is 150
Stefan; I remember Jay and John Andrews ran those tests. As my memory serves me you are correct. F6CNI did comment yesterday that 74.5-6 is best for UK/EURO. I will give it a try. I think I can use 1
Victor; Band is very unstable right now but stretching out it seems. KU7Z is in Utah and been getting traces too. Weather not that cool here- [58 F] When it gets cold I thing this band should start t
Victor; I think it can be done on 4000 meters. It is early and as it gets cold in the Finger Lakes region here the soil conductivity goes up more than other places in US. This band is very strange at
G; If I could handle more voltage at the base of my vertical I have the capability of going to 5 KV plate volts @ 2 amps plate current. I would have to use a keyed CW mode to run this rig like that.
G; Another issue is the freq! Gary shows 72.4 as cleaner on his grabber. Some of the Europeans are saying 74.550 is best. Gonna try WSPR 15 tonite on 74.550 and see what shakes. Gotta give QRSS 60 a
Stefan; Where you want to have near perfect match in BC business, to long runs of common 50 ohm line a bridge is used. A hot bridge makes things quick and easy-Bob > Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:08:28 +
