Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 841 ]

Total 841 documents matching your query.

161. RE: LF: 74.550kHz Sep 29/30 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:06:54 -0400
Markus; The artifacts were clear. I agree we need to maybe find a better spot. For tonite though I will be staying close to same freq as last night, for Hartmut no having to retune right now or maybe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00320.html (17,160 bytes)

162. RE: LF: 74.550kHz Sep 29/30 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:59 -0400
All; I plan on 74.549 as Hartmut is setup in that region of the band for tonite. He likes this region of the band and have heard the same from F6CNI [hope I have that correct]. But on the Markus grab
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00321.html (12,452 bytes)

163. RE: LF: 74.550kHz Sep 29/30 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:42:04 -0400
Dex; I moved up a big .2 hz. Hartmut likes the upper part of the band. But hell-there are allot of clear spots around. Where we are ain't bad from what grabbers I have seen namely [Hartmut and Mr Ves
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00322.html (12,730 bytes)

164. RE: LF: 74.5kHz Grabber (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 19:45:18 -0400
Hartmut; I am on every night and will keep going until band comes back. Good to see your trying your best. All bands took hit since the pasted week but I think things will get good again as weather g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00323.html (9,805 bytes)

165. RE: LF: 74.5kHz Grabber [Hartmut] (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:18:35 -0400
Hartmut; Signal showed right up till your daylight-it was great to watch your grabber work! Great going, 73, Bob WG2XRS/4 WNY > Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 01:01:16 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: rsgb_
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00324.html (9,798 bytes)

166. RE: LF: 74 kHz: XRS and CFH 73.6 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:23:17 -0400
Markus; I see that. Can't be great all the time! Am waiting for an OCXO I have coming to try out your OPDS-really think it will be great on 73! Congrats on your fabulous development! Bob From: markus
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00325.html (12,916 bytes)

167. RE: LF: 74k (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:23:07 -0400
Laurence; Always a thrill to see anything out of AK, not down on the southern most tip that comes close to BC but up on the Mainland! Even HF it is difficult to hit from the NE for some reason. Thank
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00326.html (10,479 bytes)

168. RE: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:36:44 -0400
Mike; Is that "pesky static" a characteristic of this band-from your passed experience? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:30:14 +0100 >
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00327.html (12,105 bytes)

169. RE: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:13:23 -0400
Congrats to Mike and Dex on the capture! It's just a matter of sticking it out. I expect things to get even better as temps drop and soil conductivities increase. I would hope the noise drops to some
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00328.html (11,560 bytes)

170. RE: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:40:21 -0400
Mike; Interesting indeed. When you operated here was there a push by the UK ops to move to 137? How did that come about? RSGB influence to move to 137 and just give back 73? > From: mike.dennison@ntl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00330.html (13,697 bytes)

171. RE: LF: 74kHz - history (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:33:55 -0400
Mike; All very interesting... Here in the US the 137 band has drawn, unfairly, much objection from the power grid people as you probably realize. They are fighting tooth and nail for exclusive contin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00331.html (16,325 bytes)

172. RE: LF: 74kHz Okt2/3 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:56:11 -0400
Hartmut; I guess the Aurora did us in! Will be interesting to see if signals come back tonight! Bob > Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:32:15 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] >
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00332.html (9,267 bytes)

173. RE: LF: 74kHz frequency (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:47:06 -0400
Mike-et all; Hartmut and Markus chose the freq. At that time it appeared as good as could be found. If a better one is available to everyone I can move to it without a problem [licensed for 68-76 kHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00333.html (10,109 bytes)

174. RE: LF: Back at it again tonight-74.5495 QRSS 60... (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:42:14 -0400
Joe; Hey, from a worthless RX to something that works decent! Can't complain about that-good job-thanks for nice capture-Bob > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:12:49 -0230 > From: [email protected] > To: rsgb_l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00334.html (11,377 bytes)

175. RE: LF: Clear spots around 74.55 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:42:40 -0400
Markus; I would agree to the comment that you made regarding "way it is now, but" yes it seems to change night to night-there always seems to be junk on the whole hz freqs but between them seems clea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00335.html (22,061 bytes)

176. RE: LF: Clear spots around 74.55 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:13:04 -0400
Markus; That would be OK with me and am sure it won't effect Hartmut. I can suggest to Dex to move to .5485 I will be on .5495. GL tonight-and am hoping Dex makes it too-Bob From: [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00336.html (26,315 bytes)

177. RE: LF: Clear spots around 74.55 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:48:34 -0400
Markus; I am not the one that has to rx it! Shoot Hartmut an email-I am sure you both can agree on something! From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 23:32:5
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00337.html (24,194 bytes)

178. RE: LF: Conditions (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:06:50 -0400
Laurence; I will continue trying and maybe sneak in another 74 kHz capture or two! Thanks for your efforts, Bob WG2XRS/4 [XRS4]... > From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00338.html (9,524 bytes)

179. RE: LF: DF6NM OPDS32 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:14:29 -0400
Jay; Is it essentially OP32 transmitted with good freq stability [stability as required with say WOLF] plus the addition of the "Deep Search program? Or simply a new program "OP32 Deep Search"? > Fro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00339.html (9,623 bytes)

180. RE: LF: E-mail met bijlage (attachment): 74.549.6 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:47:27 -0400
Henny; Very impressive captures! Even when signal fades down it is still showing solid! Did you change antenna this pasted week or receiver? Best TA captures I have seen along with Mike. Hartmut has
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00340.html (10,975 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu