Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 337 ]

Total 337 documents matching your query.

81. RE: LF: RE: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:08:45 -0400
Hello Paul and Stefan, I thought it would be interesting as a guide for future testing to know if path loss at 2970 Hz 100km 1000km (a mode-sensitive combination with no validated models) is closer t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00215.html (13,103 bytes)

82. LF: RE: A new distance record on 970 Hz / 309 km band (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 18:30:49 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00019.html (20,510 bytes)

83. RE: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz / iron powder cores in high electric fields (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 06:43:13 -0400
Hello Stefan, It is good to see your recent (8270 Hz) 34 dB at 31.6 uHz in Todmorden, 21.7dB 31.6uHz on Jacek's grabber, and (6470 Hz) 18 dB in 46.3 uHz in Todmorden, and a textbook DFCW-6000 spectro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00166.html (19,752 bytes)

84. LF: RE: A transductor for power regulation? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:34:26 -0400
Stefan, Sounds very interesting; would the function of the DC input primarily be to reduce output amplitude during the microseconds-long transitions between QRSS states or EbNaut or OP32 states? Or t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00262.html (13,046 bytes)

85. RE: ULF: Crossed 14.4 km on 970 Hz / 309 km band (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 05:56:13 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00320.html (24,068 bytes)

86. RE: VLF: Some natural signals (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 06:34:07 -0400
Thanks Paul, What a wonderful sound. Unfortunate that bird's magnetic sensors dont have the sensitivity/bandwidth for what you captured; they could perhaps tune their nav systems for reduced sensitiv
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00321.html (11,644 bytes)

87. RE: VLF: Some natural signals (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 11:38:34 -0400
Hello Claudio, Yes I agree with your sentiment, I was thinking of listening to the time-domain sub-Hz content; mixing or demodulating to remove any carrier (using Spectrum Lab or Matlab for example)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00325.html (14,674 bytes)

88. RE: VLF: Some natural signals (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:51:31 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00347.html (25,226 bytes)

89. RE: VLF: DK7FC 8270.005 and DF6NM 8270.005139 at DL0AO grabber (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 23:20:27 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00380.html (22,262 bytes)

90. LF: RE: today on the 36km band... (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 03:46:57 -0400
Is the current record 85 characters? (same path, 8270 Hz) Jim AA5BW From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DK7FC Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 201
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00023.html (14,128 bytes)

91. RE: VLF: list correction (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 10:58:16 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00041.html (13,872 bytes)

92. RE: VLF: tonite on the 36km band... (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 16:03:31 -0400
Congratulations! Jim AA5BW Decoded after a bit of work "THIS IS A NEW LONGEST EBNAUT MESSAGE ON VLF. 881 KM ON THE 36 KM BAND. JOIN THE VLF ACTIVITIES! 73!" list rank: 0 constant reference phase carr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00066.html (13,040 bytes)

93. RE: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 05:01:31 -0400
First TA calibration of a TX antenna current meter with LWPC I just ran LWPC for the midnight path with 10uW ERP and it comes back with 0.069 fT. http://abelian.org/lwpc/?date=2017-05-08+00%3A00&txla
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00079.html (11,760 bytes)

94. RE: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 08:30:53 -0400
The quantitative agreement is amazing and impressive The water path and favorable Dst dont hurt estimation, but the long remainder of the error budget chain appears to be impressively controlled. Rea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00081.html (11,977 bytes)

95. RE: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 11:09:06 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00100.html (14,810 bytes)

96. RE: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 13:55:05 -0400
Paul, Thanks for very good AoA validation of Joe's signal. Not sure if Joe's antenna is pure vertical and remain intrigued by VLF AoA error with VLF TX antennas that have non-vertical E components du
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00103.html (17,269 bytes)

97. RE: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 15:45:38 -0400
Joe mentioned: "Could part of this fluctuation be from propagation?" Joe and Paul, For your consideration and (with your permission) my edification have we seen natural-propagation-related frequency
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00110.html (13,926 bytes)

98. RE: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 01:36:10 -0400
Paul, Thats so exciting I created a folder in anticipation of data next winter. For those events I can provide spectrograms from 2 fT/rt-Hz receivers near Atlanta GA and Gainsville, FL; they run cont
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00125.html (14,422 bytes)

99. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: James Plesa <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
Joe and Paul, I can collect data on Joe's signal from some other receivers this week. Nominal operating sensitivity is 10 fT/rt-Hz or better; generally southwest (SSW, SW, WSW) at 2000 -3000 km Would
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00150.html (14,057 bytes)

100. RE: ULF: New experiment on 970 Hz, 2/3 (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 19:46:17 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00180.html (17,012 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu