Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: VLF: tonite on the 36km band...

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: VLF: tonite on the 36km band...
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 16:03:31 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1494187466; bh=Sdoool+CKhaWCZ6u0K0J1xY5LmabAds/AgpsKuoYDEA=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=PrS9APYqBmevigiQP0L5u06RdXzq9T+p/ffvStWVqu2+Lr8zM/gBioqKb4TfScBMb 6pabhpFqUMc0Z64vm6Y4o15aVNdyFbE9LRTnl1//j2dWwjVCwI9LxY097iFPq5lHaI lv+v8t2o8KRka+w+Pl2ZBcLrf5hJu55emQ6cHzKXSSPlNm4W9Ov4jzMEr7IQEhgLsu KiUhfFrpHWaWnYZ/Ds6uKp/dKQ+xAREyhOFiIFgxD/eROttSp6mZ06Zft35K1Ef7Kf vSziaMIXMTQ2wtxkui+XHgGL7/UkYz7NQHPCAKZ4fqFO8yvwITuJHa09a95FxUb91G Pgdb2+dH//1mQ==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQIbspaKwn7hCjnzpxvBR38SzDOZnwKD3MBWAiM57HsCtt30dQKYK0efATdGt/2g/glYMA==
Congratulations!

Jim AA5BW


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson
Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 3:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: tonite on the 36km band...


Stefan wrote:

 > f = 8270.100000 Hz
 > Start time: 05.May.2017   05:30:00 UTC
 > Symbol period: 10 s
 > Characters: 100
 > CRC bits: 0
 > Coding 8K19A

Decoded after a bit of work

  "THIS IS A NEW LONGEST EBNAUT MESSAGE ON VLF.
   881 KM ON THE 36 KM BAND.
   JOIN THE VLF ACTIVITIES! 73!"

list rank: 0
constant reference phase
carrier phase: 113.5
carrier Eb/N0: 0.2 dB
carrier S/N: 27.81 dB in 20.2 uHz,
             -19.14 dB in 1Hz,
             -53.11 dB in 2.5kHz

I started with daytime settings for sferic blanking and got a close but false 
decode.  Reducing the blanker threshold almost to night setting produced the 
correct decode.

I'm noticing that the probability of false decodes with long
messages is much higher than I expected.   It is something to
do with the message being many times the constraint length of the convolutional 
code. This I will have to study to understand properly.  There are 30 bits of 
redundancy for the outer code to use but we don't seem to get the full benefit 
of it. Some trials with 200 character messages are showing this clearly.

--
Paul Nicholson
--



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>