Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 737 ]

Total 737 documents matching your query.

281. Re: LF: Re: WSPR Timing issue (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:41:14 +0000
. And occasionally one sees spots reported at WSPRnet with an ODD minute timestamp - how's that done? John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00118.html (8,895 bytes)

282. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:13:31 +0000
And it looks like Jim's stayed down on 502 - being reported by Mark and OH8HTG. That'll please the nay-sayers - WSPR spreading all over the band! Off out for a few hours, will leave RX running on 502
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00130.html (11,944 bytes)

283. Re: LF: Re: WSPR Beacon on 503.5kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:14:00 +0000
Mark, Jim, LF, I'm seeing Jim's WSPR very well, and also hearing it, and at a reported S/N ratio of anywhere between -7dB and +10dB. The strong periods are very red on the WSPR waterfall, yet there's
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00146.html (11,352 bytes)

284. Re: LF: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:20:09 +0000
Hello Paul-Henrik, LF I've been out of the shack all evening, until now, but set Spec Lab up to show the frequency in question earlier. I'll check the 5-minte captures later, but I can confirm visual
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00149.html (11,081 bytes)

285. Re: LF: WSPR beacon on 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:48:47 +0000
Jim, LF, Thanks for running the tests. Interesting results. Much slower QSB than I expected. I found no improvement using a tuned pre-amp, so left it out of circuit from about 2300. I've just done so
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00152.html (13,497 bytes)

286. Re: LF: Razor blade RX (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:21:58 +0000
I already know all the answers. Yes, as you've told us many many many many times.....
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00169.html (10,578 bytes)

287. Re: LF: Daytime test: OH1LSQ on 136.80kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:11:27 +0000
Paul-Henrik, LF, Nothing seen over a 1/2 hour period. I've reset to WSPR monitoring and will leave this running, uploading spots to wsprnet, for the rest of the day. Still seeing DF0WD and M0BMU at a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00172.html (10,557 bytes)

288. LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:53:42 +0000
Hello LF, I'm seeing really strong signals from G0NBD, and it was decoding earlier, but now I seem to be unable to get a decode from what should be a good string (positive S/N ratio) signal. I see at
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00189.html (8,957 bytes)

289. Re: LF: WE2XGR/2 in WSPR mode (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:25:39 +0000
1st decode at 21:22 -28dB Some faint traces visible on prior periods. Looking good for the rest of the evening, John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00200.html (11,102 bytes)

290. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:21:19 +0000
Gary, congratulations - a Transatlantic crossing on 2mW ERP - your antenna must be correctly fabricated and elegantly designe - hi! Great result! John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00202.html (11,647 bytes)

291. Re: LF: 500 info (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:48:58 +0000
Gary, LF 2046 15 -18 1.1 0.503915 G4WGT IO83 3
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00206.html (8,390 bytes)

292. Re: LF: Re: Re: PROPAGATION WSPR (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:23:23 +0000
Okay then.... I would be expected to deliver the kid, perform open heart surgery on the nanny, castrate the billy. I would be on 24/7 standby in case of goat illness or accident, but not just for goa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00215.html (12,126 bytes)

293. Re: LF: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:43:53 +0000
Paul-Henrik, LF, Here's a shot of your QRSS at 2235 UTC Nice work! (ps I saw you remotely re-tune my RX while I was watching for your QRSS... I guess you heard nothing via the mp3 stream?) Cheers Joh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00226.html (10,386 bytes)

294. LF: DD7PC WSPR 137.500 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:21:14 +0000
Hello LF, I'm decoding WSPR from DD7PC on 137.5 (dial freq 136.0) but the decodes are not correctly formed, for beacon transmissions: 2008 -26 0.2 0.137501 0 DD7PC DJ No locator 4 figures and no powe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00248.html (7,930 bytes)

295. Re: LF: Re: WSPR beacon on 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:48:10 +0000
Likewise, although I'll leave the RX and WSPR running... 090114 2314 10 -22 2.4 0.137570 DF6NM JN59 23 090114 2320 10 -22 2.4 0.137570 DF6NM JN59 23 090114 2326 6 -28 2.5 0.137570 DF6NM JN59 23 09011
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00259.html (11,080 bytes)

296. Re: LF: PROPAGATION WSPR (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:40:34 +0000
Good points Mal. However CW for manual reception and QRSS, to be viewed on a waterfall display, are fine for all manner of uses and in extremis QRSS is probably more sensitive than WSPR. However QRSS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00281.html (11,506 bytes)

297. Re: LF: RE: Re: WSPR Beacon on 503.5kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:01:12 +0000
I've just re-started the WSPR monitoring, at 12:00z Will keep an eye on the display over the afternoon, when in/around the shack, and upload all spots to WSPRnet Cheers, John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00298.html (9,889 bytes)

298. Re: LF: Re: Censorship (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:22:19 +0000
Yup, the old "GR Oscillators" for UHF we used to have at work had these connectors, never knew what the real designation was. John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00302.html (10,954 bytes)

299. Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:42:52 +0000
Mal, LF, In general WSPR is very good at decoding weak signals - that's what it's all about after all - and can give reliable decodes on signals that are inaudible and only faintly visible on the wat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00327.html (12,364 bytes)

300. Re: LF: Daytime test: OH1LSQ on 136.80kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:51:33 +0000
Hello Paul-Henrik, LF, I've swapped from WSPR monitoring to SPecLab monitoring for OH1LSQ (time now 09:50UTC) - I#m not too hopeful of seeign anything in daylight.... Cheers, John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00333.html (10,113 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu