Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 296 ]

Total 296 documents matching your query.

81. Re: LF: LF antennas and Mercedes (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:23:53 +0100
Dear Mal, LF group, abundance of MERCEDES BENZ to drive on roads still >uncongested. G3KEV You keep making tantalising references to these mysterious antenna experiments Nothing mysterious, lots of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00160.html (10,105 bytes)

82. LF: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:52:11 +0100
There is definitely intermittent acty on 137 khz at times possibly CFH, but there is also other acty at times around 137.4 khz maybe related on maybe not. This is not TV spurii, my antennas are not i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00163.html (8,083 bytes)

83. Re: LF: Re: MB7LF Remote receiver relay (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:53:13 +0100
Many thanks for the many messages of support received via the LF Reflector and also for the support given at the well attended sessions of the LF Forum at the recent HF/LF Convention at Windsor rega
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00172.html (14,970 bytes)

84. LF: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:24:05 +0100
Strong rtty type signal around 137 khz most evenings and at other times. I assume this is CFH, if so there could possibly be transatlantic potential at present. Condx to EU are very good at present a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00183.html (8,294 bytes)

85. Re: LF: Repeaters (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:54:22 +0100
... just a question to you folks with English as you mother-language: is a person, who keeps repeating himself all the time, called a repeater? ;-) 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW) Sri cannot help, English is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00184.html (9,845 bytes)

86. LF: big big (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:48:33 +0100
Band acty this morning good. G3YXM had a fantastic signal S9 plus 38.37 db. Dave worked OH1TN daytime and I followed. Reino was 579 also a big signal. I am sure Dave designed and built his own tx and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00185.html (8,025 bytes)

87. Re: LF: Re: Mal on Repeaters (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:52:04 +0100
Dennis, thanks for relaying the text of a message sent by Mal. I do not see Mal's stuff anymore, I solved that a long time ago. For the record......................... Certainly I used my remote sys
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00190.html (11,481 bytes)

88. LF: shambles (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:24:31 +0100
Over the weekend acty was brisk. G3YXM was S9 plus 34.5 db but did not respond to several callers, obviously RX problems. MB2HFC was S9 plus 19 db but did not respond again to several callers and adm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00191.html (8,932 bytes)

89. LF: Repeaters (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 18:12:09 +0100
I do not think the way forward on LF is via vhf repeaters regardless on a persons QTH environment. I recently worked VK, ZS6 and W4 on 2 metres via the GB7LY repeater and all that I achieved was a tw
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00201.html (9,893 bytes)

90. LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:23:29 +0100
With Ron's (G6RO) recent success with 5w on qrp maybe the time has come to allocate a spot frequency for qrp activity. I have noticed that Ron has been calling cq on top of other qso' a number of tim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00203.html (8,010 bytes)

91. LF: new (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:27:55 +0100
Hi All Lots of acty today Sunday, band vy qrl and lots of dx about. Worked SM3UWI a new one for me. 73 de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00229.html (7,763 bytes)

92. Re: LF: ZL6QH & access to 136 (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 11:29:26 +0100
John G4CNN, In response to points: Yes, a ZL LF permit allows up to 5 watts radiated power. listening/watching at the right time. Some homework is needed on sunset and sunrise times, as near-antipod
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00238.html (10,297 bytes)

93. LF: new (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 11:34:10 +0100
A new one worked on 136 khz for me this afternoon OK1DTN/Rudo not too strong at 439. Occasional dx about on the band during the week but seldom anyone else responds to them. OH1TN appears most early
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00240.html (7,968 bytes)

94. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:16:22 +0100
Is it worth putting out a signal on 73 khz at present since the band activity seems to be nil. If anyone interested let me know. de Mal/G3KEV/SCARBOROUGH
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00257.html (7,657 bytes)

95. LF: litz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 17:33:33 +0100
I had several connections to make today using 729 strand litz wire and it took me no longer than 10 minutes to prepare and solder the ends. Using the technique that I described before on here. Spread
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00258.html (8,038 bytes)

96. Re: LF: 500 kHz as experimental license in the U.S.? (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 14:32:37 +0100
Hi Geri, Additional on their application: they have asked for several spot frequencies on the 600M band, plus 166.5 khz. If the project is approved by FCC's Office of Science & Technology (keeper of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00299.html (9,891 bytes)

97. Re: LF: Re: Big/small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 17:22:14 +0100
can legally emit up to allowed power for the op's class, in my case it is 1kW. No note about limited ERP for 136 kHz band... This regulation was already in force when I transmitted from the 150 m hig
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00309.html (11,176 bytes)

98. LF: Abuse (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 18:20:58 +0100
Recent messages indicate that some are running illegal power on LF and I suppose with all the ex Decca high power amplifiers about this could be possible. There is also the case of illegal and unlice
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00321.html (8,785 bytes)

99. LF: big sig (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 17:49:23 +0100
OH1TN was a big sig yesterday evening at 1829z 589 each way. de G3KEV/MAL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00332.html (7,547 bytes)

100. Re: LF: Re. 73KHz beacon (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 17:33:21 +0100
Laurie Mayhead wrote: Hi John and Steve,Many thanks for listening sorry nothing heard.Weather pretty stormy here tonight so will give it a miss.Will try again when conditions improve.Did anyone hear
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00342.html (8,808 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu