I couldn't find the e-mail from Andre', but I have found a very detailed explaination put forward by Peter, G3PLX, when the topic was discussed on this list in 1998. This e-mail is on an earlier mail
A couple of typos have been brought to my attenting regarding the proposed RSGB Guidelines for 136kHz. The web page has been amended accordingly. The page can be found at http://www.g3wkl.freeserve.c
Inductive RFIDs that operate at 134.8kHz pose a possible treat in the future to the noise floor in the 136kHz amateur band. A paper is currently being considered internationally that would allow an i
I write this e-mail to help clarify the position and reduce the tension caused by a RSGB draft guideline for 136kHz that has wrongly been termed a "bandplan" by some users of this list. Back in 1999
Speaking from lack of any experience of D/A converters, wouldn't D/A conversion at 136kHz to generate the I&Q channels, thus allowing filtering and DC elimination to be carried out digitally? Wouldn'
Over the last few years this annual convention has been an occasion where amateurs interested in LF have met and exchanged views and shared their knowledge on LF operating, technical and experimental
Thought I would re-send as it didn't appear to be reflected - maybe it isn't spam! John Speaking to the sysop we can limit e-mails that are passed by the reflector to those that are sent from a subsc
I'll take this up with the sysop... John, G3WKL There have been a number of instances recently (one today) of spam being sent via the lf reflector. The reflector is in fact configured so that anybody
Good idea, I'll try and make it this year! John, G3WKL --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Andy talbot Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 09:
Just to remind all that RSGB guidance on the use of 136HKz, at http://www.rsgb.org.uk/bandplans/136khz.htm, lines up with Mal's comment below. The detail of this updated guidance has been sent to the
For info for those who haven't already seen this on the ARRL website. 73 John, G3WKL --Original Message-- From: ARRL Web site [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 19:47 To: g
Thanks to all who organised, gave presentations and attended the session. Nice to meet friends old and new, and I thought the lectures informative and stimulating. Sorry that I had to dash away at th
Can anyone help with details of the location and directios? All ready to set off and the website's down it would seem - grateful for details asap from anyone who has the detail. I need to set off in
Dick, the current IARU agreed bandplanning for 136kHz is now out-of-date and a new set of Guidlines has been adopted by RSGB and sent to IARU for discussion at their Region 1 Conference in San Marino
The call for moninations for the above award was placed in the September issue of RadCom, page6. This is a reminder as it is now getting close to the deadline. Details of the award are at http://www.
I endorse all comments - yes, it was discussed at the LF Forum, but I am not aware that anyone has found a semi-automatic way of archiving the e-mails with a simple browser-based retrieval mechanism.
My problem is that the attachment is on a Silver Birch tree - if they are the same in the US as here in the UK (probably larger, hi!) that means that they are quite strong but move about a lot - thus
It's a few months ago that we looked into this and I can't instantly recall the downside, but it either added an administration burden and/or affected those who access the reflector with more than on
