Although from the receiving end watching 120s QRSS on 72.4kHz is like watching grass grow at the transmitting end it turned out to be fairly exciting. I had not studied the propagation predictions an
John Andrews, W1TAG Clearly seeing G3AQC and G3LDO, though they are moving apart from each other! Screen shots later... trying to be sociable upstairs. In view of your report I will leave the transmi
Peter, I may be seeing some pieces of your signal. Got a dash on 72400.24, now looks like another on 0.23. There are some scraps on higher frequencies before that. Strangely, Laurie is in a fade. A
Peter started "LDO" transmission at 23.36 UTC on 72400.29 Hz If you can see signals from Peter and Laurie. Perhaps, on this occasion, giving the difference in frequency would help locate LDO in the
Hi John time I Did you intend an extra "0" in that? Such as: 72400.31? Yes that is correct, also Jose reports a drift of one part per million per hour Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail <[email protected].
guys I will be listening. Er, make that --watching--. I hope to come on tonight as well. I will be on 72.400kHz sending LDO QRSS120. I will make one transmission between 2300 and 0100 UTC. Last time
Had a successful 73kHz/136kHz crossband with EA1PX starting at 0800 this morning. To start with Jose's signals were only readability T but improved by the time the QSO finished as shown on the attach
I watched 72.400 - 72.4015 last night from 2245 until 0230, and nothing definite was seen. There was a weak signal approximately 0.1 Hz lower than 72.401, but I would assume that it wasn't Laurie. I
Hi Peter I note your replacement of the sealed batteries in the UPS with old car batteries. The UPS will charge them correctly but the car batteries will produce hydrogen, I believe, even on a maint
I'll we watching the 72.4000 to 72.4015 window tonight. Presently all is clear within that range. QRN here is now moderate from a front off the coast but hopefully will subside after dark. I have be
The QSO I've made with OH5UFO was very fine, good signals both side, a great surprise for me to be >received in Finland, over more than 2100 Km path, in spite of my little ERP. Evidently the propaga
Laurie, I checked last night, and 73.401 still looks good over here. And I will actually be home on the evening of 6-7 Nov. But I can run screen captures if you pick another date. I made an attempt
I put out a beacon using QRSS3 today (Saturday) and will do the same tomorrow morning around 0800 on 71.650kHz. Any reports would be appreciated. QRSS signal clearly audible at around S4. Regards, Pe
At this moment (0840 UTC) I hear G3LDO with CQ on 73kHz: RST 359 with the aerial system tuned to 136kHz. Thanks for the report Dick. Although I was sending a CQ I wasn't listening much because I had
Came across DF6NM in QSO with RU6LA using Hellscreiber. Gave him a call and the following resulted. The blank bit at the beginning is my transmission. Regards, Peter, G3LDO Web <http://web.ukonline.c
Friday 2100 Returned home after visiting friends and checked the 136 band. Saw I5TSG very good signal. Then two signals, one RU6LA and YU7AR. I dont know if this was the signal from the YU or if it w
I think what Jan-Martin has is the old LF Experimenters Sourcebook which is a comb bound compilation with a blue cover, of copies of articles published before 1995. In fact I think there were two edi
Hi: José Does anybody else receive a continuos carrier on 137424.3 Hz ?? My receiver does not have the frequency resolution to measure to the figure you quote, however there has been a carrier on 137
Jim M0BMU said -- Looking at http://www.lightningstorm.com/ls2/gpg/lex1/mapdisplay_free.jsp it seems that the thunderstorms in the US have finally died out for the time being, so I will run the Jason
I apologise for this off subject question but I am not sure where else to look. I am trying to find a detailed description of the original experiments done by Prof Uda on the parasitic element antenn
