Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 147 ]

Total 147 documents matching your query.

41. LF: EARS (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:21:56 -0800
Seen some response to the asymmetrical ear syndrom but got a lot of private mail indicating that it was more common than one would imagine. Since I mentioned it lots of operators have been testing th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00232.html (8,207 bytes)

42. LF: cq galore (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:05:26 -0800
CQ's galore. OG5UFO, OH7OL. DL3FDO, IK5ZPV and HB2ASB and no one replying to them. Gave IK5ZPV a call and gave him 569 got 559, then HB2ASB, got 589 gave him 559. Did not reply to the others at this
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00233.html (7,960 bytes)

43. LF: monkey (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:38:16 -0800
Years ago I was doing some R and D at Canedon near Southend on Sea. We were using some wooden masts each 300 ft high ex radar experimental masts. I had a KW2000A rig in my car working/M. I met a loca
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00234.html (7,973 bytes)

44. Re: LF: Re: Antenna Modelling (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:23:46 -0800
OK. I accept that the real antenna might differ from the model. This is because I do not know the detailed structure of the antenna or your ground characteristics and had to make some assumptions. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00237.html (10,622 bytes)

45. Re: LF: Re.Ground Loss (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 20:51:49 -0800
LAWRENCE MAYHEAD wrote: I have just measured my TX ant impedance(R term) and it is 120 ohm! much higher than I originally thought.It is of course all ground loss,I am using 3 ground rods close to the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00260.html (9,577 bytes)

46. LF: receivers (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:23:42 -0800
Most receivers around are adequate for 136 khz reception of radio amateur signals. Basically all that is required is a narrow IF filter especially at the the last IF normally 455 khz to avoid adjacen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00261.html (8,380 bytes)

47. LF: transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:07:00 +0000
Until we get some of the big antenna 160 metres operators in the USA/CANADA and the UK plus the rest of EU interested in 136 khz the chances of a qso are NIL across the ocean. These operators have th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00314.html (9,363 bytes)

48. Re: LF: transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 20:44:18 +0000
Dear G3KEV, Have you made a specialty of positive comments Sincerely Andre' N4ICK I try to be realistic. Most are struggling to work each other a few hundred miles around Europe on LF. I hear them e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00331.html (10,738 bytes)

49. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 19:26:20 +0000
Hello LF-Friends, the negative result of the recent transatlantic experiment only says that the usual ham methods for LF contacts are not adequate for a transatlantic distance. A weak signal never e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00335.html (11,991 bytes)

50. LF: OE ACTY (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 13:07:38 +0000
OE5ODL has his antennas up again after all the storms damage. I worked him a few minutes ago at 559 each way. He is putting out a nice signal into the UK. Did not hear anyone else calling him althoug
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00347.html (7,739 bytes)

51. LF: acty (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 18:22:21 +0000
Lots of acty today Sunday. Worked IK5ZPV 579 each way. OE5ODL 559 each way, OG5UFO 529/559. Heard DL/G/GM but did not call except to work G3DQC to give him a report. Seen some acty also on LMCW. Swit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00352.html (7,917 bytes)

52. Re: LF: 8 kHz loading coil (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:31:14 +0000
Hello (V)LF experimenters, I have an idea of resonating my existing vertical on 8 kHz. Is there a practical way to construct a 600 mH loading coil, withstanding 3-4 A and high voltage? Any *large* t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00369.html (9,296 bytes)

53. Re: LF: OM2TW QRV again... (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 18:15:31 +0000
Hi all... I'll be QRV on 136 again this weekend 5/6.2.2000. I'll use about 150W and 170m long antenna starting saturday 1500Z until sunday 1000Z. QRSS also possible, normaly around 136.7 and 136.9kH
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00032.html (8,714 bytes)

54. LF: 7S6SAJ (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 19:05:23 +0000
The strongest signal that I have ever heard on 136 khz. 7S6SAJ was S9 plus plus with his 210 metre high antenna. The only other signal on the band nearly as strong is MM0ALM. Who says large antennas
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00061.html (8,984 bytes)

55. Re: LF: 7S6SAJ (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 19:33:54 +0000
Geeees what a signal!!!! go for it state side!!! Congratulations! 73 de Ivan HA5TS Hi Ivan. You do not mention any other stations that you heard. Did you hear only 7S6SAJ. The 7S6SAJ stands the best
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00062.html (8,434 bytes)

56. Re: LF: 7S6SAJ: ufb sigs (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 19:25:58 +0000
Hi Christer, hi all, beautiful kilowatt signal here in Bavaria (JN59NK) today at 1410: 7S6SAJ 33 dBuV/m, G3KEV and G3YXM both about 4 dBuV/m. Just goes to show the difference in RECEIVING capabiliti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00063.html (8,691 bytes)

57. LF: 136 activity (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 21:48:25 +0000
Hi All. A lot of activity today Saturday. 7S6SAT vy big signal all day. Morning vy busy with acty from every corner SM4DHN, IK5ZPV, OG5UFO, ON, OZ, DL/DJ, and lots of G acty. Worked DF3OE, his first
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00064.html (7,821 bytes)

58. LF: OM/G (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 10:45:26 +0000
OM2TW was very active yesterday( Saturday) with a S5 signal all day at my qth, and besides my qso with him he worked a number of other EU stations. OE5ODL was also a good signal consistant S5.and I h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00072.html (8,381 bytes)

59. Re: LF: Re: F is QRV now! (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 14:47:57 +0000
Great! Where are they all? Tired of waiting. Maybe they dont know about it yet, everybody else does !!!!! There was more xband acty from France before the licence authorization. I have worked severa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00075.html (9,551 bytes)

60. LF: OM/G (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 18:47:15 +0000
According to G3YXM web page the qso OM2TW and G3KEV was a first between these two countries. To get things into perspective, its a question of being in the right place at the right time. Most station
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00080.html (9,020 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu