Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 271 ]

Total 271 documents matching your query.

41. LF: Re: Re: R: CT1/G3KEV (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:08:47 +0100
I've just invented a new item in the Q-code. QRSP? meaning "are my signals smug and pompous "? and reply QRSP 23/11 your signals are smug and pompous on 23 November (for example) Bryan - G3GVB Iam gl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00009.html (11,438 bytes)

42. Re: LF: OFF TOPIC but radio. (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:41:20 +0100
OK. found it. !Adjustment on rear panel. Evenin' all. Bryan --Original Message-- From: Tom Boucher <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: 19
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00010.html (8,580 bytes)

43. Re: LF: OFF TOPIC but radio. (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:26:05 +0100
Then there must be a pot to set somewhere (or maybe a virtual one ) my side-tone would wake the dead even with ear-muffs. Mislaying the manual hasn't helped ( Bryan --Original Message-- From: Tom Bou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00011.html (8,770 bytes)

44. LF: OFF TOPIC but radio. (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:46:49 +0100
Does anyone know how to lower the volume of the cw side-tone on a IC706Mk2G ? If I turn down the volume control I need to turn it back up again to hear the incoming signal each over. This gets tediou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00012.html (10,995 bytes)

45. LF: Re: CT1/G3KEV (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:24:58 +0100
Security type at Gatwick was an ex- RN telegraphist. My key is ex-Danish railways hence so much nostalgic talk I almost missed the flight LOL. Tip: put it in hand-luggage and you can resolve it there
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00013.html (10,053 bytes)

46. LF: Re: Re: LF. UI signals (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:34:32 +0100
In the back of my mind is a reference to a US AM broadcast station with an unexplained regular frequency change cycle. Peter. I've seen that one. DX I think because it fades up at particular times in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00014.html (8,924 bytes)

47. Re: LF: Dummy-Load on LW (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:12:48 +0100
I am enjoying this but was there no consideration of the likely load impedances needing to be fed? Surely all the finer points of line loss are wiped out if a mismatch or lossy matching network becom
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00015.html (15,640 bytes)

48. Re: LF: Dummy-Load on LW (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:09:09 +0100
which raises the question I have often wondered about. When I started in ham radio all coax was post-war surplus 75 ohm. I assumed in my youth it was to match a free-space dipole !. When I came back
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00016.html (11,428 bytes)

49. LF: Re: Re: Dummy loads at LF (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:44:19 +0100
What does SAQ use? Bryan G3GVB Dear group, at a wavelength of 2200m I can't see any reason why a bucket of salt water can't be used as a "poor man's dummy load". Also, water needs a lot of energy to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00017.html (8,205 bytes)

50. Re: LF: Re: Re: "T" versus "L"aerial (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:01:17 +0100
I agree entirely B -- Original Message -- From: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: 29 December 2003 12:03 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: "T" versus "L"aerial D
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00029.html (14,674 bytes)

51. LF: Re: Re: "T" versus "L"aerial (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 22:06:26 +0100
I find it difficult to believe that there is any different loading seen at the bottom of two L's in parallel but with opposing horizontal parts from that seen by a single wire vertical to the Tee or
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00030.html (10,896 bytes)

52. LF: Re: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:26:36 +0100
What a delight it is to be on this list. LF could well stand for Literate and Febrile I am digital-techniques ill informed and not sure if you are using ^ to mean "to the power of " but is your quest
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00031.html (18,221 bytes)

53. LF: Re: Re: Config change (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:17:37 +0100
I thought "get it up " was about antennas? Sorry John but the new config doesn't seem to be working. There are three "get it up" spams awaiting my attention - all came through 'thorcom' and the refle
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00032.html (8,727 bytes)

54. Re: LF: activity (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:35:10 +0100
In LF parlance how slow is "QRS" please. I have tuned over 136 countless times and heard an amateur cw signal only once. I guess I am among those who have deserted the band for this among other reaso
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00033.html (10,000 bytes)

55. LF: Re: activity (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:28:51 +0100
QSL all that. I saw GI8AYZ on QRS testing yesterday with a good strong audible signal, also OM2TW on QRS audible. Why QRS with good strong signals perfectly workable on CW. A lot of LF ops have deser
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00034.html (8,997 bytes)

56. Re: LF: Spam etc (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 08:55:40 +0100
ah! Not so elementary . Perhaps the clue is in the call sign and signal-mode M0RIA - RTTY Yes, they certainly can. The text-only e-mail client I use with this account, though, allows for viewing the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00035.html (9,392 bytes)

57. LF: Re: test (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:36:39 +0100
where are you and what will you send? CW? QRSS ? Bryan Hello ! Today (04/dec/2003) test my equipments. 137.7 17 - 19 GMT -- Best regards, Sam, rn6bn mailto:[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00036.html (8,557 bytes)

58. Re: LF: Spam etc (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:32:59 +0100
remember that anyone can write "Re:LF: " "at the start of the subject to make it SEEM as if it came thro' the reflector. Try it. It may not have come from the reflector at all. Sherlock Holmes - G3GV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00037.html (11,368 bytes)

59. LF: Re: Spam ..... cheer up. (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:54:34 +0100
some newbies are here waiting for rain to stop to get up something even remotely resembling an LF antenna in a space 50ft x 150 on top of solid chalk and a few feet of clay. BTW what would be the val
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00038.html (9,082 bytes)

60. LF: Re: Spam, viruses, etc (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:32:24 +0100
Ukonline.co.uk does both these things. Its spam filter is excellent. bryan Re Spam, etc; Just find a service provider who has a good spam detector on their server. Mine - Pinnacle - installed one six
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00039.html (10,396 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu