Copied the END OF TEST and HELLO WORLD here, but also lot of QRM, probably next doors Christmas madness. Could see others were there. Chris, G4AYT, JO01MI.
Who was transmitting QRSS on around 137.64 yesterday afternoon? A massive signal here, just caught WMR in the fast ID ahead of the QRSS, but couldn't understand the QRSS - looked like the spacing was
Hi Chris, G3XIZ, Just to confirm, as one would expect, very strong audible signal here in Whitstable, Kent on 137.69. Sorry can't get back to you at present. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT.
Hi Pete, Well, I think most of us would have spotted that number, but assumed it was just coincidence. I do think it would actually be helpful to publish the callsigns of NoV holders. Not only would
Pete, I think the main requirement band plan wise is knowing which section to monitor for QRSS and other narrow modes, as one is restricted to quite a narrow bandwidth, very narrow with the slower QR
Thank you Markus! That explains it, I didn't realise that Opera-8 looked like that when monitoring for QRSS, that's going to be confusing (for me), especially if the signal is weak! Vy 73, Chris, G4A
OK Stefan, Yes, there is a bit of slow QSB on your signal, see attached capture. You are excellent audible copy indoors on my Eton E5 too. There was another station sending TEST about 40Hz away from
All modes, as per the licence and 136/7 band. Roger, yes, a couple of us are thinking about some QRP AM across town (subject to non QRM to other locals), and why not? Some sort of agreed band plan wo
Hi Stefan, As I guess you would expect, or at least hope, MASSIVE signal here in south-east England! Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent, UK, JO01MI. -- Original Message -- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <
I thought the 'new band' was originally to be unrestricted, i.e. not by NoV, in the UK. I think it's a shame as this will surely reduce occupancy. I will probably stick to 136/7 myself. Chris, G3XIZ
Hi Geri, Thanks for that idea/information. I guess there are possibilities with this method for narrow AM as well. Definitely worth looking into. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: ger
Hi Henny, Nice strong audible signal here in SE England on 476.17kHz. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, JO01MI. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] henny To: [email protected] blacksheep Sent: W
Hi Colin, Not too sure what you're getting at. We all have our individual interests. I hope you're not suggesting the new band should only be used by obsessive DX CW only enthusiasts? Chris, G4AYT. -
Who started the trend to have QRSS in the middle of the 'new' band? There are two extremely strong signals there now as I write this. I would have thought any mode that requires long plain carriers w
I was surprised to see on page 9 of the latest RSGB RadCom under '2013 Band Plans', a statement re the 472 - 479kHz band:- "Activity is limited to modes with 500Hz bandwidth or less". The implication
Hi Stefan, I agree with Mike, XDV, it makes more sense to have QRSS near the band edge, for the reasons stated. I cannot agree with your suggestion that QRSS would cause problems to 'normal' CW opera
