<< Or is it now possible to generate a completely fictitious communication path header? Alternatively the originator may be in blissfully ignorance? I would be grateful if someone would comment.>> Al
<< Dick has indicated that Earth Resistance gets higher when the ground is wet. That seems strange and contrary to accepted theory. The ideal ground plane for a vertical is on a wet plain or preferab
For example, if one had a loop antenna suspended in free space, would the ground loss resistance become zero? If one has ANY kind of antenna suspended in free space, the ground loss becomes zero. [gr
Dick Rollema's noise bridge schematic and a photo of his assembled unit can now be downloaded from: http://lwca.org/library/articles/pa0se/earth/ 73 John Davis
Sorry, all. I meant to send that response directly to Dick. Sometimes my mail client chooses its own reply-to address rules, seemingly at random, and I don't always notice before clicking on Send. Jo
<< In the first version of this e-mail the circuit diagram was included but it did not pass the reflector. >> Hi Dick, As usual, I'll be happy to host the diagram on the LWCA site if you'd like to ha
<< This is the wrong way to achieve high impedance (and good IMD), it is no need to keep the "source current low" {etc} >> I do not see anything in the Web page that suggests keeping the source curre
(In regard to Echolink) I see no reason why you couldn't connect your rcvr to one end and ARGO to the other to create a really remote rcv site. Would allow true real time viewing from Alaska to GB as
<< If the loss of efficiency will be abt. 10dB compared to a fullsize-dipol(measured at 1.8MHz!) then it would be a hope for all lowfers with large aereas and tolerant neighborhood :-) >> I suppose i
Just out of curiosity, have others been missing messages posted to this reflector? I can be sure it's not due to an over-active spam filter on my e-mail account. (AOL are blindly enamored of their gl
<< just to say that after my forward of Ted's revision of Ohm's law i did not receive more mail from yahoo eh-forum. >> Heretics, infidels, and non-believers always have a difficult life, Valerio. Ho
Never believe anything you hear or see!!!!!!!!! Too many pretentious experts not surprisingly from the South, and often adamant that they are right!!!!!!!! >> Sounds like the car dealer radio adverts
In a message dated 4/20/03 6:37:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: It seem there is onother device for radiating on 137 kHz, it is the EH loop from the same original mind of th
<< yes the FCC can, and does grant "Part 15" licenses. In fact AMRAD has held such a license to transmit on 136 kHz for several years >> A slight typo here. I believe Andre' is referring to Part 5 of
<< Obviously more and more of some government's decisions are directly influenced by the power of industries and large companies! >> It reminds me of a time several years ago, Geri, when a reporter o
Sorry, doesn't look like we'll be joining the rest of the world on LF any time soon. The Federal Communications Commission turned down a US ham band at 136kHz for the foreseeable future. There's a st
