Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 154 ]

Total 154 documents matching your query.

141. LF: Re: GPS-locked PSK tests (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 23:21:51 +0100
Absolutely perfect copy of the GPS locked BPSK signal from Jim at the low power setting. Although, at this power the signal can still just about be detected by ear, so I'll be more convinced when the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00005.html (9,659 bytes)

142. LF: GPS Locked signalling (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:08:37 +0100
A bit later than intended, I'm now in a position to receive GPS locked phase coded transmissions without the need for any lock up or clock recovery. So I am looking for anyone who can transmit BPSK o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00016.html (10,978 bytes)

143. LF: SPAM - Off Topic, slightly (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:38:09 +0100
I was on the verge of cancelling this EMail account because of the amount of spam. But on BBC Breakfast this morning they mentioned the MailWasher software. Look at WWW.MAILWASHER.NET This lets you g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-09/msg00022.html (8,462 bytes)

144. RE: LF: Re: GPS-locked PSK tests (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 13:59:08 +0100
At the moment that is basically all that I'm using. An analogue vectorscope made by multiplying two quadrature 1kHz waveforms by the output fom the Rx after passing though a 1kHz bandpass filter. The
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-09/msg00023.html (9,667 bytes)

145. LF: Re: 136 khz LF (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 00:06:55 +0100
You can't possibly mean -5dBm. Even if propagation were line of sight, at 200km distance (near enough between you ?) Free space loss = 32.4+20LOG(f.d) [MHz, km] = 61dB. EIRP max 30dBm so max power re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00010.html (9,887 bytes)

146. LF: RE: MSF (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:46:27 +0100
Yes. it is undergoing its maintenance period and will be on and off for a few more days. Look at the NPL website www.npl.co.uk and follow the links to time and frequency measurement. During the perio
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00011.html (8,373 bytes)

147. RE: LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:55:52 +0100
OK, Thanks to all for replies on the noise generator calculations. I'm now quite convinced its a simple SQRT(2*BW / Fclock) power division from the total calculated from peak waveform voltage. The la
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00023.html (11,134 bytes)

148. RE: LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:18:30 +0100
Yes please, do that. My feeling is that there 'has' to be a pi in there somewhere, Errors in H&H aren't unknown... I dislike SIN(X)/X calculations, they always involve PIs in strange places and never
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00024.html (11,041 bytes)

149. Re: LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:39:01 +0100
Right, think I have an answer now, thanks to Stewart and Stewart... If the total integral = pi watts (Ok, volts squared over an arbitrary impedance, but call them watts for now :-) this is what my 2.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00025.html (13,286 bytes)

150. RE: LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:01:47 +0100
Yes, the power spectrum of a SIN(X) / X pattern. To Brian 'GVB, the limits will be (theoretically at least) - infinity to infinity, but in practice a few lobes will be sufficient, say about +/- 5 And
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00026.html (10,957 bytes)

151. LF: Related Technical Query - Soundcard calibrator (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:55:01 +0100
Is there anyone who can answer this... I want to make a calibrator to enable accurate (better than 0.5%) absolute audio measurements using a soundcard - ie. at audio frequencies to 20kHz. Generating
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00027.html (13,083 bytes)

152. LF: Re: Where to get TC44... and MUR1660?? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:42:43 +0100
Farnell will have them. www.farnellinone.co.uk Andy G4JNT Hello all, I am wondering where I can get (one of) the following components: TC4421 TC4422 TC4426 MUR1660CT A google search didn't deliver a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-01/msg00000.html (10,418 bytes)

153. LF: RE: Re: Re: First WOLF QSO! (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:37:24 +0100
Basically, correct - if you transmit 10B/s PSK on 137kHz without any bandwidth filtering people get a bit upset. We did look at turning it into some phase continuous mode - CPM - but there seemed to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-01/msg00001.html (12,361 bytes)

154. LF: Re: 3C90 Al value? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:09:46 +0100
I thought Al values was a meaningless term for pure ferrite materials and is only published as a guideline as it changes dramatically with temperature and B - for a true/ideal transformer it would id
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-01/msg00002.html (10,412 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu