Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 538 ]

Total 538 documents matching your query.

361. LF: DK7FC/p TXing WSPR/MF on fieldday (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 15:26:47 +0200
Hi MF, There is a fieldday of our local radio club. I will be there and transmit and receive a bit on MF. Most likely there is no chance to use a large antenna so i will use my small 1m diameter loop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00010.html (10,582 bytes)

362. Re: LF: DK7FC VLF probe (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 14:22:57 +0200
Hi Joe, That choke was just intended to improve the supply voltage stability (low pass filtering). It's value is not critical. Meanwhile i've learned that it can be helpful to spend a ferrite bead in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00042.html (11,137 bytes)

363. LF: LF WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 15:01:41 +0200
Hi LF, I switched back to LF, now running some WSPR-15 sequences and ocasionally some WSPR-2... 73, Stefan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00043.html (10,216 bytes)

364. Re: LF: DK7FC VLF probe (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 15:17:17 +0200
Am 09.05.2015 15:10, schrieb [email protected]: [...]The resistors and caps (1M 100k 68pF 680pF etc) between the FET's are for lowpass or something else? R, cfm. 73, Stefan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00045.html (10,779 bytes)

365. Re: LF: LF WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 00:13:02 +0200
Hello Iban, Thanks for watching :-) Your receive setup is one of the best on LF and MF! 73, Stefan Am 12.05.2015 19:06, schrieb Iban Cardona: Hi Stefan nice signals in Spain some days ago. 2200 -9 4.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00059.html (12,374 bytes)

366. Re: LF: Tx test QRSS-30 476.180 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 00:20:41 +0200
Hi Luis, Good luck for your test! It is interesting! Maybe it is not the best time in the year :-) Very strong QRN today due to local thunderstorms. Anyway my grabbers are running 24/7. My frequency
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00060.html (11,593 bytes)

367. Re: LF: Almost (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 00:34:58 +0200
Mike, Interesting to read about your RX equipment. Sounds like a bit effort but must be a great fun as well :-) I like the different antennas, and i'm glad to read that there is interest to get my si
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00334.html (19,248 bytes)

368. Re: LF: Almost (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 00:40:52 +0200
Markus, It's 474.2 kHz dial ;-) 73 Am 31.05.2015 00:36, schrieb Markus Vester: Hi Mike, you won't need separate receivers and PCs just for observing WSPR at both speeds. Frequency bands are adjacent
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00336.html (24,281 bytes)

369. Re: LF: Dual-speed WSPR (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 01:33:54 +0200
Markus, What about the old slow-WSPR by DF6NM? It could be useful to try WSPR-4 for experiments. There is not just 2 and 15. And WSPR-120 on VLF... No problem! 73, Stefan Am 31.05.2015 01:28, schrieb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00342.html (10,385 bytes)

370. Re: LF: Almost (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 02:58:08 +0200
Mike, how are things looking now on your side? Strong QRN? Same QRM-QRG than last night? 73, Stefan Am 31.05.2015 01:15, schrieb Michael Sapp: RRR Stefan, if you could slide up a few Hz that would be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00344.html (10,923 bytes)

371. Re: LF: problems with mails to the list? (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:09:26 +0100
Hi Jacek, LF, For the first time i have problems to write emails to this list. BTW i wonder why this happens on a late friday afternoon! For the moment i'm using another account now. I'm in contact w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00150.html (12,259 bytes)

372. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:47:27 +0100
Hi Paul, ULF, Sorry for my late reply. The transmission takes quite long, so there is no need to stress with my answer :-) Thanks for the overview of the signal received in Bielefeld. Quite strong an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00152.html (17,439 bytes)

373. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:05:55 +0100
Hi Paul, ULF, Wow, just amazing! Can't we say we already made it? Isn't it extremely unlikely that this is something elso than my signal?? A first signal detection by amateurs on the 101 km band betw
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00164.html (16,412 bytes)

374. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:22:54 +0100
...i would have another explanation :-) 73, Stefan Am 22.03.2017 10:13, schrieb Rik Strobbe: Hello Luis, maybe your big building is good for transmitting but not so good for receiving due to all the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00166.html (14,085 bytes)

375. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:00:51 +0100
Hm, i remember from my LF days that people tend to say i have "no ears" when i didn't copy them. They copied me very good and so their easy conclusion was that obviously i do not receive well. Actual
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00170.html (17,465 bytes)

376. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:57:16 +0100
Hi Luis, Am 22.03.2017 11:15, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fern&aacute;ndez: How far away from my QTH can I use an SDR for Rx in a quite site and still consider it real 2 way QSO ? This is a "Pandora box" p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00173.html (12,736 bytes)

377. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:15:14 +0100
Hi Paul, Interesting. Do you also use the noise normalisation function which proved to be useful in recent stackings on 5170 Hz? Still a few weeks before the 6 channel input soundcard for the Raspi a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00176.html (14,478 bytes)

378. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:43:48 +0100
Hi Paul, While waiting for the lunch today in a restaurant i Berlin, i checked the antenna current in Heidelberg on the smart phone (you know :-) ). I suddenly discovered that the safety function has
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00193.html (15,163 bytes)

379. Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:49:21 +0100
Hi Jim, ULF, i wondered why the trace at IK1QFK in 5 wavelengths distance becaome so blurry in the recent days. See http://www.webalice.it/rromero/live_cumiana/last-LFtest_2970.jpg and use a zoom fun
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00194.html (16,315 bytes)

380. LF: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:07:54 +0200
Hi Paul, I've never had serious problems with the WSJT-X software running in WSPR-15 mode. However they did not continue to develop WSPR-15 since some years. For example the multi-pass decode option
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00212.html (12,471 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu