Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:01:26 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1542236499; bh=c8bBpgew2a694mQbtv1fGTSagM6sQWu/NEIg/HRg/co=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Skvbmp1OBToR5sABz/Xip4HpZWWAy3doFiiJIctc1fqzTO6yN6k8xmLxz/rXOLp95 MTWx5cMZkvzfaBWd2sYIByzSwHQg5c5GdFLmezhcH74ctWowXFj1Hw11WV+fNPURA1 7qpPEAfkemDQ/5hYrUL4zZcjvxARhtdTWP42jxR+6dHERg07xApvZdaEFZCmCEIYkH WLSYH9Zzthze6tsCP58QFZNicoZZ3T9gGSBmTWbt+u/adIUKXnr3DPLhoHEeznlJzO FXK26Sr1W5ZldcXSbqhJO/3kKY5IkAMcMsVpfD4O+uSFfrraTzLh5FJ1v4QD55b3oG z90z0Uubakd7g== |
| In-reply-to: | <D3DF2EF6F86245D7B0977BF90E4494A2@DELL4> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <1UQdmM51gp.72JLQAKj0yF@optiplex980-pc> <0B79F81E329D4776B77EB8F1165ED920@Rob64PC> <CANA3B6XO327hcnBoYNhmx00y6iMvA10FU_aO+wU6+Wn0G3sGNg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6XdOw9YCRa0Snz4cttqwajwyJWVs6O1ke68MAw7SsTQxA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CD9AC850D03A4387B4795BF96B795187@DELL4> <[email protected]> <B4190AF4D1C84119ABAF83ED141290AF@Rob64PC> <1UQdpUA6cP.HNoz3mwzw0b@optiplex980-pc> <[email protected]> <D3DF2EF6F86245D7B0977BF90E4494A2@DELL4> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Jay, Paul, Am 14.11.2018 22:09, schrieb [email protected]: Yes, it seems the current WSPR2 decoder is much improved. Think your time might be better spent on that mode since there are already many listeners. It would be interesting to see how far west into the US you could be decoded on a good night. Best distance to the US on 137 kHz was AB0CW in Colorado, 8170 km. That was WSPR-15. Am 14.11.2018 22:58, schrieb N1BUG: My WSPR2/WSPR15 transmitting tests last season showed that WSPR15 was much better than WSPR2... even though most WSPR2 listeners were using the new improved decoder and WSPR15 listeners were using the old WSPR-X. ...that's the thing.Then imagine when using the new WSPR-2 decoder in combination with the 'old' tools... 73, Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Another Eb-Night, Markus Vester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Another Eb-Night, Riccardo Zoli |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15, N1BUG |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Carrier at 517.920 kHz, Roelof Bakker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |