I am interested in this too, but if I recall there was a reason I
didn't install those tools. I can't remember now... maybe they don't
work on 64 bit machines? If that was it, I am out of luck.

My WSPR2/WSPR15 transmitting tests last season showed that WSPR15
was much better than WSPR2... even though most WSPR2 listeners were
using the new improved decoder and WSPR15 listeners were using the
old WSPR-X.

73,
Paul


On 11/14/18 4:09 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Stefan
> 
> Vague memories ... the tools, if they still exist, would be on an old 
> computer that's not so easy to 
> resurrect.
> 
> Yes, it seems the current WSPR2 decoder is much improved. Think your time 
> might be better spent on 
> that mode since there are already many listeners. It would be interesting to 
> see how far west into 
> the US you could be decoded on a good night. Just my opinion ;~) .
> 
> Jay W1VD
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "DK7FC" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:51 PM
> Subject: LF: WSPR-15
> 
> 
>> Jay, LF,
>>
>> I already have the next idea, maybe for tomorrow? ;-)
>>
>> You remember the early days before K1JT released WSPR-15.
>> Markus developed the slow-WSPR tools and we (you, as the DX RX station ) 
>> tried WSPR-8 and even 
>> WSPR-30 successfully.
>>
>> Using Markus tools, the slowly transmitted WSPR (with accurate FSK spacing) 
>> was accelerated 
>> replayed in the next time slot and then fed to the normal WSPR-2 decoder, 
>> beeing connected to the 
>> database.
>>
>> Meanwhile the WSPR-2 decoder performance seems to have much improved. So, it 
>> may be interesting to 
>> try the 'old' tool of Markus together with the latest WSPR-2 decoder.
>>
>> What do you think? Do you still have the config files and so on?
>>
>> Worth a try?
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>> PS: 137.620 kHz is right in the WSPR-15 defined slot. I think this is why my 
>> coil is resonant 
>> there ;-)