Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite
From: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:35:17 +0000 (UTC)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=a2048; t=1542213322; bh=Yu6OH1gJBYrKXQx1KXyk6hensLsb6o8CDEict7QAnDk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=jPEfGInwWRNvZKyKtJ/uErcl0UN4u1cLLW8X3gujuoFe/8A9oZ8Je2yqE6Ps5qLgI9fve08qfxUR7aE6Q/Oo6D5l8B3wXq0vbcpHFOgYbNNU3pKGZ4y8aGcDpvqiXcSi+9e8oaDgjhrIt2dShqnYhhOzdcD6qmM3HdYc2HLmnQ9HoRw0CxhK1s53MYtW2u3zzLVbSE7ORjUv5CiBUtxKgS5rD1z9jJ0axXyQHMuis/GjXFh3OytjuQsRVyn5ZzXWkqexwZMdyJns2cPPo2cEWiAHz9inBhxGU7wQuMbYfd9S5jyUQ/wPUQ789LVwXeEBwNz/dmA7qt3L3gkwmy/n4g==
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Amazing images! If the spread-out PSK signal is so well visible in a spectrogram it would have decoded with plenty of margin.

Best 73,

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: N1BUG <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Mi, 14. Nov. 2018 11:00
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite

Hi Stefan,

I would very much welcome the chance to see you on my grabber and /
or try to decode you on JT9-5. If you try either one I will leave my
TX off.

Unfortunately I am not able to decode EbNaut but you certainly do
brighten some pixels. :-) See attached files if they come through.
My TX was off last night due to bad weather.


On 11/14/18 3:04 AM, DK7FC wrote:
> Hi Jay,
> Thanks for the decodes and the efforts.
> A pity about the other stations outside the bandwidth but anyway it was
> nice to see 4 EbNaut stations side by side! Maybe the other stations
> catched something...
> Anyway it seems the conds have not been good at all. Is the
> 180,180,180,180 result the final decoder result or did you take a
> capture right after the message appeared the first time?
> If the phase is that stable, it must have been the SNR, i.e. high noise
> levels and/or a lossy path.
> If i can find the time today, i may add some turn on the coil and come
> back on 136.172 kHz for some DFCW, like in the good old days :-) Then
> the QSB and phase variations doesn't matter and it is also a chance for
> Pauls new grabber.
> Or, some tests with JT9-5. But it seems to be hard to transfer 13
> characters in 5 minutes these days. Looks like i need a real coil again!
> 73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>