Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite

[Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>]

Amazing images! If the spread-out PSK signal is so well visible in a spectrogram it would have decoded with plenty of margin.

Best 73,
Markus 


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 14. Nov. 2018 11:00
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite

Hi Stefan,

I would very much welcome the chance to see you on my grabber and /
or try to decode you on JT9-5. If you try either one I will leave my
TX off.

Unfortunately I am not able to decode EbNaut but you certainly do
brighten some pixels. :-) See attached files if they come through.
My TX was off last night due to bad weather.

73,
Paul

On 11/14/18 3:04 AM, DK7FC wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Thanks for the decodes and the efforts.
> A pity about the other stations outside the bandwidth but anyway it was
> nice to see 4 EbNaut stations side by side! Maybe the other stations
> catched something...
> Anyway it seems the conds have not been good at all. Is the
> 180,180,180,180 result the final decoder result or did you take a
> capture right after the message appeared the first time?
> If the phase is that stable, it must have been the SNR, i.e. high noise
> levels and/or a lossy path.
>
> If i can find the time today, i may add some turn on the coil and come
> back on 136.172 kHz for some DFCW, like in the good old days :-) Then
> the QSB and phase variations doesn't matter and it is also a chance for
> Pauls new grabber.
> Or, some tests with JT9-5. But it seems to be hard to transfer 13
> characters in 5 minutes these days. Looks like i need a real coil again!
>
> 73, Stefan