Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: FET driver driven direct from a Si5351a questions

To: David Bowman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: FET driver driven direct from a Si5351a questions
From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:42:10 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JdIIG/ycnKj+ajFq1DUtxPOlVpoG42N+pC6OFfcu9/w=; b=oCdwXtzsORxDh7lZO3HHjgzO1yQ7aOREdKOEhL0dI6Oqyyc2tdaSM9tiinue4aZLQv pvgdLv7O4pd5VJwhNqNJA3H3ge2tCx2abhrsQ6YC+4Huu+bimGSCDaN8hDiicYltHKS3 rlrTLm4bBlxKhalvNuiHn555qmcVuY3a2nvWnWhvp1fkzLj+hmV4gA1b/BtrbRpTPvYQ 4JST99mnu1N1OsDOeIoh5GQq7BHJufS5FUSzweJkfLETs4XWYRB6dYsJ8RxDr2X0kR9g 2npIG6dTlDJXbKJyKkndlQYVgcJTl5L8tBs4NSzGEbm+yFyDNHStU/f6R6CMrjZT4xv7 Qjtw==
In-reply-to: <CA+GfORvSpdQUKB_ejMmn4i4UxzN6i8XuvrkZYpNPmyz5Okx2-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CA+GfORvSpdQUKB_ejMmn4i4UxzN6i8XuvrkZYpNPmyz5Okx2-g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Hello David,

Thanks  for  the reply. I will try this I take it you just tie Input A
and  Input  B together and feed it a x2 signal with X2 tone spacing if
using  WSPR?  I  am  pretty  sure  there's  either  harmonics or another
frequency  riding on CLK1 when in this new Iv mode so I am moving away
from  that as you suggest.  I now have a refreshed set up whereby I am
able  to use the TS-590 for sensible TX operation of JT-9 with either the
Red  Pitaya  or  the  590  as  the  receiver.  So  when the LF antenna is
operational at your end I should be able to work you :)

Thursday, October 11, 2018, 9:36:03 PM, you wrote:

> Hi Chris.
> Not sure I have a solution for the circuit you have.  

> However, it may be worth not using the 180 degree outputs from the
> Silab oscillator.  Have you thought about the advantages of a FET driver
> that has a common input but 2 antiphase outputs ??
> The TC4428 is an example. They take great care with rise times and
> propagation delays....perhaps the Si device does not give 'perfect' waveforms.


> Worth a try ??


> regards


> David




-- 
Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:[email protected]



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>