To: | LineOne <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Apr 2018 22:34:00 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kXFh5hb8wGHCNJVFiHu23y0k0eZkYbeKiWeFbmPJh1Q=; b=Oz7bAN08QkioC9QFIUSt/PbGvOkPajbbQYi0YeE2wZWf7xQDdgTLUDNAbStLbEPJay I4LuepszQWLq+4/lt8VSQlU/zc+bWCYpeR4uKHzqPFMm1E6QuMRqrLXcNnndaoSMzCif hOswzjdyjl2j/dGjQZmKrO3O69f8h0Q7KSvGvmhbRhLYDmRsSR3fR1nFqkXnGtTVqXSM L7nVMDiXEt7CHrX8ekXAlQezAx7jWRBA0LYFFxZqEObBCC7pfkv2W3U4oN1hyJbUzCtw v7GU4EoaT97UrLPCCDJAxkaF3kdfnLvZDHGvlgSx/PqOe5oXC8EJG/BIbF8mxMR268g7 /N7Q== |
In-reply-to: | <8D5E7536EB86447B920A6B0C99E2BA88@gnat> |
References: | <1UQRRBrZ33.5N62o0UWd72@optiplex980-pc> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BFE1E3A433664900AE95DE6D9EE733BC@StevePC> <[email protected]> <7950E881690348FB8A48C42DD2735F8D@StevePC> <1UQRSH98Tx.2IrTZ1ue7L6@optiplex980-pc> <[email protected]> <7FBAA3A0B6C84158BA005CFF09A5A7EA@DELL4> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <8D5E7536EB86447B920A6B0C99E2BA88@gnat> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Yes, I agree with Alan and fail completely to see why the driver should have any effect on the ringing. It just cannot.
As I keep saying, such ringing is commonplace in SMPSUs and is due to leakage inductance in the transformer. I don't like torroids as they don't allow you to enclose the winding nearly as much as as ETD or pot core type of construction does and I'm sure contribute more leakage L than more enclosed core types. There is more wire facing outer-space than there is facing ferrite when you have windings of only a couple or turns. . But everyone else just seems to have accepted torroids are the best thing, so carry on. Someone must have originally said they're the way forward but I'd love to know why no one just uses standard SMPSU cores. I'll just tootle along with switching power amps built with tank circuits and only then into a transformer, and let everyone else go their own way. It just seems such a simple and obvious route, I cannot understand the need to generate a square wave, force it though an unwilling transformer then use a complicated low pass filter to clean up. The only LF amp I've built where push-pull FETs go straight into a transformer is a linear (well, almost linear) one - just to see if it could be done. About 40 - 50 Watts from a 28V supply, 60 - 70 watts saturated with scope for improving it with better FETs http://www.g4jnt.com/Linear_LF_PA3.pdf . The output transformer for that was just an RM10 sized pot core of F44 material. I suspect that if pushed hard into saturation, and the feedback CR removed from each drain-gate it would also show ringing on the edges. But there's little call for linear amps on the LF bands. Andy G4JNT On 12 April 2018 at 21:43, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote: Paul, Chris, Jay et al |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms, Chris Wilson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms, Alan Melia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms, Alan Melia |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |