To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:43:09 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1514497389; bh=i5Dp2To4bbubmRiqJZA6tQ0Wgivj0nOM2PTZ3A30Rds=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=p8BSjA8G6UQsuft4xQRBzCLw6a6cO8q1r7d6jth7VMG3tGunSsKjQg5FB7AYVPnVy B5kW6JfSippv65nG6Ok4tHOuVBbFDwnUXBakH9gGa6hQvgZqZmg63QsvExN9vg6xsR +aZh+zpilYCotP4lNiK+s+DtJDjU0iO7ob3wkl3w= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Stefan as a "local" crosscheck, I had a look at your 3-character transmissions from DL0AO. Here are carrier Eb/N0 and "initial reference phase" from the EbNaut decoder's log files: Files 5k17W_12dd2252.txt (21 uHz) Offset 0.05 Hz -2674 s (94% covered) date dB deg 23 9.1 34.4 24 8.8 30.8 25 6.9 25.3 26 9.1 47.4 27 9.5 86.1 Apparently received EbNaut phase was somewhat different during the last two nights. On the other hand, the phase plot on the grabber shows that the daytime carrier had a repeatable phase pattern. If you like to check for yourself, I could send zipped txt files in a private email. Best 73, Markus -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: DK7FC <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Do, 28. Dez 2017 18:53 Betreff: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band...
Hello Alex,
Thanks for the reception and the files. Unfortunately the message is not correct. I analysed your files and found the message at: 23rd: -8.0 dB 24th: -5.0 dB 25th: -6.2 dB 26th: -10.0 dB 27th: -16.2 dB 23+24: -3.6 dB 23+24+25: -1.7 dB 23+24+25+26: -1.4 dB 23+24+25+26+27: -2.1 dB It looks like something happened on the 27th. The noise has not really been higher than average but the message is quite down in the noise. Hmm, maybe there was some snow on the GPS antenna for example? It could have happend during the transmission of the 26th, this could explain why the signal is so weak. Or something happened with the antenna? When trying to get a decode from 23+24+25+26 only, the right message appears at rank 648. But there are several other stronger messages here. Also this (that 23-26 is better than 23-27) is known information, thus the decode would not be valid. So we are almost there but we failed :-( So maybe you are right, maybe a restart is a good decision. On the other side, you will loose all messages that are started for now, the message from Dex and so on. In the end it is your decision... It may be worth to check if the antenna+preamp is still working. 73, Stefan Am 28.12.2017 16:58, schrieb Alex K:
|
Previous by Date: | RE: R: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR, Clemens Paul |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 8269.9 kHz EbNaut 28/12/17, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band..., DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band..., DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |