To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz |
From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Oct 2017 20:49:24 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Paul,oops, that is strange. Maybe the PA is a bit nonlinear (slightly clipping) and the measurement is mixed up. I will try to solve that. Well the difference between 5090 and 5170 seems not to be very much.Would it makes sense to repeat the experiment? Tomorrow i could run it for a longer time, e.g. 6 hours. Then there should be usable values on each antenna and frequency. 73, Stefan Am 27.10.2017 20:03, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Stefan wrote: > Since 13:20 UTC im running 120 mA on 3 individual frequencies: > 5090.005 Hz | 5130.005 Hz | 5170.005 Hz > Carriers stopped at 16:20 UTC.... Received in 92.6uHz H-field (new) E-field 5090.005: 9.3 dB 10.38 dB 5130.005: N/A See below 5170.005: N/A 10.2 dB N/A where the signal is too weak to measure. Something wrong with 5130.005, here's the E-field spectrum http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/171027a.gif -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz, Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |