Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: VO1NA on LF:

from [jcraig] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: VO1NA on LF:
From: jcraig@mun.ca
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:19:59 -0230 (NDT)
In-reply-to: <595A4E76.1050905@posteo.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1707011751100.27136@plato.ucs.mun.ca>, <5958BD88.20265.6DA371@roelof.ndb.demon.nl>, <Pine.LNX.4.64.1707021527430.29267@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <595A3E0C.11545.D6ADE2@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <595A4E76.1050905@posteo.de>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
Hi Stefan,

The TX is now on 8270.007 +- a few ppb.  Thanks for the
advice and good luck to those looking for a trace of
the weak VLF sigs!

Joe VO1NA

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, DK7FC wrote:



Am 03.07.2017 14:52, schrieb Roelof Bakker:

Hello Joe,

Propagtion is a weird thing.

LF propagation at least :-) MF even more.
I find that VLF propagation is quite predictable, reproducable and understandable :-) 
73, Stefan

















[More with this subject...]










<Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread>




















Previous by Date: 
Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M, Paul Nicholson




Next by Date: 
Re: VO1NA on LF:, Markus Vester




Previous by Thread: 
Re: VO1NA on LF:, DK7FC




Next by Thread: 
Re: VO1NA on LF:, Markus Vester




Indexes: 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists]