Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M
From: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 22:53:41 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAC+C6w6mjcnjXJr3AeYFRmUmAKurkWVB=qXYT7_w4kjn=LjsrA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, DK7FC wrote:

Is there any improvement of the Neo-7M over the Neo-6M? [...]

the neo-6m can generate up to 999Hz on the timepulse output. this is good for a 1pps timing source for vlfrx-tools (just shorten the timepulse to 1ms, it's 100ms by default)

the neo-7m can generate up to 24MHz on the timepulse output, but this is a NCO with 48MHz clock, so for clean output pick frequencies which are 48MHz/N where N is integer. this is a good reference for transmit applications (of course it can do 1pps too).


the other difference is that while the chiniese boards with both neo-6m and neo-7m often have an eeprom on board, only the the neo-6m will read it upon startup. or at least i haven't been able to make the neo-7m start with my settings after powerup.

to solve this i use a simple C program to talk UBX protocol to the gps to set the required parameters. in my case this is 57600 baud, disable SBAS, set 20kHz timepulse on lock, and set 4Hz refresh rate. i use the nmea output to set time via ntpd, and the 20kHz signal as a reference to ebsynth (right now i use it for sending stable carriers, but eventually will do ebnaut too). i can post the program in case anyone is interested.

another fun fact: these are really cheap gps-es with not-so-stable clocks. you can break the gps lock by changing the temperature quickly, even by blowing compressed air at it. use a lot of thermal isolation.

VY 73

Jacek / SQ5BPF



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>