To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M |
From: | Clive Lorton <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:13:30 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6ZYAf9yEdIaOfGX6FKz64BiSGrcpVYp9HcKa7nLr5tw=; b=NM5pMQmpkgPdIeyA5jZ2eVyVSwl+VNJRNO+X8qzYklDR4jqaROvFeZ6Dx+sGzMsI2V jA+dezrGGML5kFwdnIfYPFycQtC/8bDrusTOOZiqvK7fACk+mA9vFwb6BNfLbqTNHb8F Q4XviZulb/BKB0MdP3MBTUJArPakdAMzkPQ0g5YicBQNteFCB5e75METLgexaIn3TtyX wm8gR4l1b9Gwxkfqrbn/+D0Cs33SgQzkCrWufXluXKeRejz3qTpRRzkOHT99536uO4nc 7hX5/RomarFOkNqIQgsIz2A/2a8c6aiDq8Iss3zTRNgxRFpCEdQFMfesHuK+POph4RKf eSuQ== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAC+C6w6mjcnjXJr3AeYFRmUmAKurkWVB=qXYT7_w4kjn=LjsrA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Everyone, If you are looking for a 1 pps reference I would advise QRP kits QLG1 .www.qrp-labs.com/qlg1.html It uses a MediaTek chipset which I believe is more accurate than the UBLOX. It is also more sensitive. Mine works on the bench inside the shack, whereas the Ublox 6 and 7 both require an external antenna. What it does not have a configurable time pulse as the Ublox. 73 from Clive G8POC On 26 June 2017 at 16:54, DK7FC <[email protected]> wrote:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M, Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M, Jacek Lipkowski |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M, Jacek Lipkowski |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |